Guest blog by Charles Wilson FICM, Managing Director of Lovetts plc - 'Setting Clear Expectations'

Driving to work yesterday after the Easter holiday yesterday, I was listening to the Today programme on Radio 4. The meaning of the new Archbishop of Canterbury’s first Easter message was being debated. In his address, Justin Welby appealed to everyone to adopt realistic expectations for what institutions, or individuals, could achieve. In the end, all humans are fallible, he said. (I suspect even the new Pope might agree, who knows!)

Afterwards, commentators differed in their views. Was he sensibly advising us to manage our own expectations, including our expectations of him? Or was he abrogating, as one suggested, his own responsibility to give us a clear lead from the outset?

If you read the text of his sermon in full, it is pretty clear. He was urging us to be realistic in what we can all achieve, in these terms “Complexity and humanity are ignored, and we end up unreasonably disappointed with every institution, group and policy, from politicians to NHS, education to environment”.

In a time of economic uncertainty, and business difficulty, it is easy to think that others should, or even that we ourselves can, deliver a solution that is “perfect”. Whether you are a Prime Minister, a credit professional, or a business manager, in the end you always have to rely on others. You have to delegate a lot of things. You have to choose what NOT to do. You have to trust others, knowing they may fail.

Some business leaders never take holidays. I commend Philip King for doing so and hope he enjoyed his decorating over Easter. He is not abrogating his responsibilities to the Credit Industry, he’s not given up on us, or on Government, he’s just having a well-earned break!

In fact, it is only as we ‘let go’ of trying to achieve perfection, and subject our plans to human fallibility by sharing them with others, that our world enlarges through them.

As a lawyer, I could tell you all about the Jackson reforms of the legal profession, effective this week. Like the increase of the Small Claims’ limit to £10,000. But any search engine will give you more than enough to read on that.

Most important of all is that we set realistic expectations of what can be achieved by credit departments or third parties on their behalf. As lawyers recovering debt, we try our utmost, but keep realistic. If we don’t, we’re set to disappoint. Despite Government cutbacks, changes and reforms in the Court Service, we must nevertheless all keep trying to influence and effect change for the better. As Justin Welby said, “Setting people or institutions up to heights where they cannot but fail is mere cruelty”. I agree.

Extracts from Archbishop Justin’s sermon by kind permission of Lambeth Palace – see www.archbishopofcanterbury.org

Guest blog by James Caan - 'The certainty of payment'

Cashflow, as every entrepreneur will tell you, is the lifeblood of business. But despite this simple truth, the challenges that all businesses – and especially smaller business – face this year and every year, is how to keep the cash flowing? This is especially challenging when it seems that every barrier is being put in your way to stop you from getting the cash you not only deserve but is yours by right.

 

The basics are, of course, to invoice on time, promptly and accurately. They are to ensure that your quote has been accepted, the product or service delivered, and the terms and conditions of payment agreed in advance. If you do nothing else but stick to these simple rules, then your business will not only survive, but it will actually have every prospect of growing and contributing to the economic recovery that we so dearly seek.

 

And there is more that you can do. The Government is keen on encouraging the banks to lend, to support businesses through the good times and the bad, but overdrafts or loans are not the only ways of ensuring you have the cash you need, when you need it. Alternative funding mechanisms such as factoring and invoice discounting rarely deserve the negative publicity they are inclined to attract, and Supply Chain Finance – a particular favourite of Government in 2012 – also has its place for certain companies at certain times.

 

Knowing your customer is a particular mantra of the Institute of Credit Management, and again the tools at a company’s disposal – from credit reference agencies to credit insurance – all have a role to play not just in protecting you from the damaging impact of not getting paid, but more positively in taking on new customers and even new markets, safe in the knowledge that you are better informed.

 

Much was written last year about naming and shaming the poorest payers, but there is so much that a smaller supplier can do to bring about the certainty of payment. As professionals, it is incumbent upon the ICM and its Members throughout 2013 and beyond to ensure that the support is there for these companies when they need it most.

 

To read the full press release click here.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Standing tall and proud'

When I said in my blog last week that it was time for credit professionals to stand up, to be noticed, and to be proud, I was talking about the value they contribute to their organisations and to the wider economy. I'm glad to say that I'm seeing a trend that exemplifies the pride I'm talking about.

I've noticed an increasing number of ICM members who include their designatory letters - AICM, MICM, MICM(Grad), or FICM - on their business cards, their email signatures, their LinkedIn profiles, and elsewhere. These letters are not just given away when someone becomes an ICM member; they have to be earned by gaining qualifications and/or having their practical experience verified, validated and reviewed.

Some might say the practice is archaic but I believe those who have earned them should be proud of their achievement and are right to use them in this way. If you don't tell people what you've achieved, who else will?

I've also seen a marked increase in the number of ICM members wearing the ICM badges we launched earlier this year. This, too, is a good way of promoting your professionalism and - if you don't have a badge - simply email icmmembership@icm.org.uk and we'll be delighted to send you one.

Don't be a shrinking violet!

Philip King, CEO of Institute of Credit Management (ICM) - 'Judge or Jury'

I had the privilege of sitting on the judging panel last week for the SME category of the National Business Awards. It was the first time I've been a judge where the nominees have to present a 'pitch' and it was a fascinating experience. I've always wondered what it felt like to be a dragon in the den, and I guess this is the closest I'll ever get to finding out!

There were 12 entries and we spent a long day listening to a series of presentations from a range of very diverse businesses. It was inspirational hearing from people who have turned an idea into a business that is thriving and, in some cases, hugely successful in a very short space of time.

The common theme, certainly among the front runners, was unbridled energy and enthusiasm and a passion for a business that entrepreneurs saw as 'their baby'. If those qualities could be replicated and reproduced across business, it's hard to believe we'd still be struggling to see the recovery for which we all yearn. So often, the idea was simple and certainly not rocket science. As a judge, I was left thinking why somebody else hadn't thought of it before and wishing I had a more creative mind that could spot what seemed like obvious opportunities once somebody else has pointed them out!

The Start-Up Loans Company in which I'm involved has now started lending and, at the Board Meeting this week, we were hearing examples of young people who are determined to turn an idea into a successful business and - judging by their determination - will do so.

On the political front, we've heard Vince Cable's announcement about the new Government-funded bank to support SMEs. The devil, as always, will be in the detail but I certainly welcome the plan to bring together in one place Government finance support for small and mid-sized businesses. As I've said here recently, the multiplicity and complexity of schemes often results in them almost working against each other so if the new bank helps to simplify and de-clutter the landscape, it can only be a good thing.

It was good to meet Michael Fallon, the new Business Minister, this week and I'm at the Labour and Conservative conferences over the next two weeks. It will be interesting to hear what the parties have to say at this mid-way point of the current Government.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Watching and learning'

I attended my third Start-Up Loans Company Board Meeting this week, and it was a masterclass.  If you've read James Caan's autobiography, you'll know that he attributes much of his success in the recruitment sector and subsequent businesses to his skill at asking questions, teasing out meaningful responses and, as a result, choosing the right people.

As each director presented an update on what had been achieved in their area of activity since the last board meeting and set out their key challenges, it was fascinating to observe him use questions to unearth underlying themes, and then use further questions to identify the priorities for the month ahead, and commitment to getting them achieved.

It's difficult to pinpoint the specific techniques or words used, hard though I tried since I always like to watch and learn from people I meet.  I guess it's more of an inert talent that just seems to work, and it's amazing to watch in action.

Individuals aside, the progress made in the last 60 days is incredible and the next 60 days are going to be really exciting as Start-Up Loans become available and the scheme fully operational. Watch this space for more details to follow and, in the meantime, I've been reminded of the power of people-watching and learning. I'll keep hoping that some of the positives rub off on me now and again!

To find out more about the Institute of Credit Management visit www.icm.org.uk or follow Twitter Http://www.twitter.com/ICMorg and http://www.twitter.com/philipkingicm

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Just the job'

Some of you who know me will know that, since I spend a fair amount of time on the road, I am an avid listener to audiobook biographies as I drive.  Last weekend I finished listening to the biography of Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson. The audiobook is unabridged, and on 20 CDs lasting 25 hours so it took a few weeks, but what a listen and what a story!

  

I wouldn't suggest that he was an ideal role model for, in many respects, the book suggests Jobs' style and communication skills left much to be desired.  Nevertheless, he had some qualities without which Apple wouldn't have grown from a start-up in his parents' garage to the world's largest company, and without which the Apple products wouldn't have earned the reputation they have for simplicity, quality and intuitive use.  He brought ideas, art and technology together in ways that invented the future.

  

His ability to focus on a small number of projects or details to the exclusion of everything else allowed him to ensure they received absolute and undivided attention.  His relentless drive for perfection meant he never settled for second best and never compromised any of his design principles.  His ability to see the future for his and other products and predict likely trends enabled him to spot opportunities in the market that would otherwise have missed and indeed were often missed by other players already in those very markets.

  

Some leaders push innovation by being good at the big picture, others by mastering details, but Jobs did both relentlessly and delivered a range of products over 30 years that transformed whole industries.  He quoted Henry Ford as saying "If I'd asked people what they wanted, they'd have said a faster horse; our job is to show people what they can have"; Jobs believed Apple should show people what they were going to want before they knew it themselves; he said Apple's task was to read things that were not yet on the page.  When you look at the graphical interface introduced on the Mac, iTunes music downloads, iPods, the iPhone and, most recently, the iPad, it's hard not to accept that he did exactly that.

  

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of his personality was his frequently cited "reality distortion field' which resulted in him seeing things as he believed they should be rather than as they really were, and in him refusing to accept that something couldn't be achieved.  At the end of the book the author says that almost all the many people he interviewed would share a litany of examples of how badly Steve treated them but end by saying how he got them to do things they never dreamed possible and which they didn't believe they were capable of.

  

If you get the chance, it's a cracking good read (or listen) and has some great good and bad examples from both of which there is much to learn.

To find out more about the Institute of Credit Management visit www.icm.org.uk

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The power of collective action'

I blogged a couple of weeks ago about the impact we can have as individuals and the responsibility that carries with it. Developing that thinking, I've been reminded this week of the collective power of individuals coming together with a collective aim. Winston Churchill is oft quoted as saying: ‘Never doubt that small groups of people can change the world. In fact it’s the only thing that ever has.’

I attended my second board meeting of the Start-up Loans Company this week and James Caan has pulled together a formidable group of people, allocating responsibility for particular aspects of the programme to each director. In four weeks an amazing amount has been achieved both individually and collectively by a group of people who believe in the benefit of what is being delivered and are committed to making it happen. We are at the start of a really exciting journey and I believe the concept and reality of Start-up Loans is going to be a huge success about which I'll no doubt write more in the months ahead.

When I look around the membership of the ICM, I see similar stories every week. A group of people come together as a branch committee, for example, and deliver events for local credit professionals that educate, energise, and motivate them to deliver more as individuals and for their organisations. At ICM HQ, following our restructure in January, I see the team working together with members and other stakeholders to deliver quality events for the wider credit community; in the last couple of weeks alone, I've witnessed this at our Regional Roadshow in Cardiff, the QiCM Best Practice Event at Reading, the Fellows' Lunch and Graduate Reception in London, and the Education Conference in Birmingham.

To close with a further quotation, this time from Aristotle: ‘the whole is more than the sum of its parts’. Working individually and collectively, we can make a real contribution and make a real difference. That's what our credit community is all about.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The changing 'Face' of Debt Guidance'

Since mentioning the publication of the new OFT Debt Collection Guidance in my blog last week, I've now had chance to look through it in detail. No great surprises; it's very similar to the draft on which we were consulted some time ago and says what I guess we'd all largely expect it to say. It is, after all, only an update of the version of the document issued in June 2003.

The aspect that seems to have caused the greatest debate on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group, and elsewhere, is the OFT warning to debt collectors not to use social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook to pursue people who owe them money. I don't want to be pedantic here but I'm not sure that's exactly what it says. Actually what it says is that unfair or improper practice would include 'acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor...' which includes, as one of the examples quoted 'posting messages on social networking sites in a way that might potentially reveal that an identifiable person is being pursued for the repayment of a debt'. That's a long way from banning the use of Facebook!

I might be showing my age here but I remember lecturing ICM evening classes at Watford College in the 1980's and recall teaching about s40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which addressed the unlawful harassment of debtors and included the works: 'A person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under a contract, he harasses the other with demands for payment which, in respect of their frequency, or the manner or occasion of making any such demand, or of any threat or publicity by which any demand is accompanied, are calculated to subject him or members of his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation'.

So nothing has changed really; in those days, the example of harassment was parking a van outside someone's house with the words 'debt collector' written on the side. Surely all we're talking about here is the 2011 equivalent? There's nothing wrong with using social networking tools to find people or to learn more about them but harassing people by any means is - and must be - unacceptable. Those who have seen me present using a baseball bat as a visual aid will know that such a bat is an equally unacceptable collection tool!

I am intrigued by the following words in the Foreword: 'This guidance document is not intended to provide a basis for debtors to avoid the repayment of debts duly owed. We consider that debtors should take responsibility for engaging appropriately in the debt recovery process...'. On the one hand, I am encouraged by its inclusion; on the other, the fact that they have to write these words at all makes me think that the document is weighted heavily in favour of debtors. We shouldn't lose sight of the fact that taking on debt carries with it an obligation to repay it, and that should always be the starting point.

The Guidance carries considerable detail and Consumer Credit licence holders would do well to read it and ensure they, and any third party organisations working for them, are complying with it.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Merlin loses its sparkle'

Vince Cable has apparently, and allegedly, admitted that Project Merlin has failed. The Merlin agreement with the major banks guaranteed that lending to small businesses would increase to £76bn in 2011 but his acknowledgement that 'new mechanisms' would have to be considered is a tacit recognition that Merlin hasn't worked. The Chancellor's announcement last week of his 'credit easing' plan of a new credit line for business is further evidence.

As I said at the time, the idea that commercial banks could be 'forced' (as some commentators described it) to lend seemed farfetched at best. Commercial banks have a responsibility to ensure that their lending risks are justified and their lending policies are sound. We've all seen spectator examples in the press of where they may have got it wrong but receiving much less publicity are the numerous cases where they've declined to lend and have been right to do so.

I won't pretend to fully understand the concept of 'credit easing', the detail of which has yet to be made clear, but Phil Orford, the Chief executive of the Forum of Private Business asked three very sensible questions in a recent blog about a scheme which it would appear would require Treasury officials, or officials of an agency specifically appointed for the task, to have a start making judgments on lending taxpayers' money to private sector firms:

• How will they decide which companies deserve a loan from the taxpayer?


• How will the money be channeled to the businesses that need it?


• If these businesses are safe bets, why aren't private lenders already lending to them?

All will become clear in due course and I'll be fascinated to see exactly how it will work.

The other issue that needs to be addressed is how to encourage those business with outstanding debtors to use best practice in credit management to release that money and therefore reduce their external cash requirements. It might even save them having to look for working capital funding at all, but more of that next week by which time I'll have met with two MPs - one Conservative and one Labour - and discussed such matters.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Being proud to be a professional'

I was at the fifth CCRi Conference this week and what an excellent event it was. With more than 400 credit professionals gathered at the Guoman Tower Hotel in London, it proved a great opportunity to network with colleagues, and provided plenty of learning to take away. I shared a quote I'd seen the night before in my brief comments at the beginning of the day that 'Leadership and learning are indispensable to each other'. How true those words are. Standing still is not an option because, if we don't grow and develop, the world moves on and leaves us behind!

Trevor Williams, Chief Economist at Lloyds Bank ended his keynote speech by observing that the future is impossible to predict because there are 'so many imponderables'. If that's true, and I believe it is, then all the more reason why credit professionals must build their skills and knowledge so they can continue to add value to their businesses and help them survive and prosper. What might have worked well a year or two ago won't necessarily work now and, if we assume it will, we could get seriously caught out. The new ICM CPD scheme currently being piloted, ahead of its formal launch for 2012, is well timed, and so is the continuing progress of our learning and development programme. We're demonstrating our commitment to providing the tools to equip people and make them truly effective, and feedback from our members and potential members attending CCRi on Tuesday was universally positive.

Credit management is a profession in just the same way as accounting or law are professions, and those of us working in it must not be afraid to make that point to our colleagues, peers and bosses. Credit management sits at the centre of the business and touches every aspect of the organisation; now is the time for us to stand up, be counted and show pride in our professionalism.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Joined up thinking benefits customer'

I recently experienced, at close hand, the efforts of the police, local authorities, and other agencies attempting to work together to protect a vulnerable child. What it demonstrated to me is that acting independently creates frustration for all those involved or affected, prevents the best outcome being achieved and, indeed, stands in the way of getting the required result.

The same could be said of business. In far too many businesses we hear about the 'them and us' attitude that exists between sales and credit departments and how neither party is at fault when something goes wrong.

Take for example my own experience last week when I checked into a hotel ahead of the ICM Regional Roadshow in Sheffield. It was late and I was tired. I took the lift to the fourth floor only to find that the key card wouldn't open the door to room 411 (a not unusual occurrence in my experience) so I returned to reception and had the key card re-coded. The new key worked perfectly but as I stepped into 'my' room I realised from the bags on the bed and the clothes on the floor that somebody had got there first.

I returned to reception and was moved to a new room that was mercifully vacant. On my third visit to the Reception desk, I asked the very pleasant young lady why she didn't feel the need to apologise for the inconvenience I had been caused. Since the card coding machine malfunction wasn't her fault, and someone else had made the error that resulted in me being booked into an already occupied room, it was clear - in her mind at least - that there was nothing for her to apologise for!

Wherever we sit in an organisation, but especially as credit professionals, when we communicate with customers, suppliers or any other stakeholder, how we respond reflects on our business and how it is viewed. As Glen Bullivant reminded us at the Sheffield Roadshow last week, credit management - whether we like it or not - is customer service because we face the customer, we talk to the customer, and we manage the customer. Doing it well, and working effectively with all other parts of the business, is just one way in which we add real value. I'm reminded that someone once said: 'There's no pleasure in knowing the hole is in the other end of the boat'.

Oh, and if you were in room 411 at the Park Inn, Sheffield last Wednesday, you had a very lucky escape!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Pride in Professionalism!'

A couple of weeks out of the office and I'm back raring to go. I looked at only a few emails, turned off Twitter and was generally very well behaved - I think even Mrs K was surprised! While I was absent, I gave away my daughter on her wedding day which was as perfect as we could have hoped for, spent a few days in the North West of England, and watched the world going mad. Riots in London and elsewhere, the US economy being downgraded, and a possible European financial meltdown as just a few examples. So back to reality and I've decided not to join in the bigger debates that have been going on while I've been away since all the arguments have already been expressed and in better words than I can use.

I do want to share some thoughts on professionalism though. The Institute of Credit Management (ICM) delivers cash for business by empowering credit professionals working in those businesses to be more effective, and a couple of emails received from ICM members during my holiday reminded me of just how important the credit management role is. Members of the ICM are professionals working in the field of credit management who recognise the importance of what they do and are keen to develop their own knowledge and careers, whether that is through qualifications, training courses, keeping up-to-date through reading Credit Management magazine and ICM Briefings, attending regional networking events, participating in online forums, or engaging in other ways. In short, they are showing pride in being professional by belonging to an organisation that supports them, works for them, and encourages them.

And yet I meet many people working in credit management who, although they recognise the value they add, don't see it as a profession in its own right. Many of us would argue rightly that it is a challenging, rewarding and worthwhile profession, and needs to be seen as such. We have made significant strides in recent years in gaining recognition but we need to do more. The new Continuing Professional Development scheme the ICM is piloting is an example. More important though is getting those of us who do the job to make sure our peers and business colleagues (above and below) understand that we're working in a profession we're proud of and is vital to the sustaining and growth of business and the economy.

If you know someone who's working in credit management and hasn't yet got round to joining the ICM, give them a nudge or send me their details and I'll nudge them. The more members we have, the louder our voice will be and I'm on a mission to raise the volume - let's get all credit professionals to show Pride in Professionalism!

Guest Blog by Rob Beddington, Director of Commercial Relationships at the ICM - 'The Ratings Game'

In my (too many) years writing about the credit industry, the importance of accurate credit ratings or limits has always been a hot potato, whether a particular decision is made about a small start-up or a multinational going through a sticky patch. This situation could not be better illustrated than the one we are seeing in the fallout from the US debt crisis, where the last minute deal by Congress to increase its credit card bill has brought differing reactions from the three main ratings agencies. Although Moody's has given the lawmakers the benefit of the doubt, it has already assigned a negative outlook to the USA's long -standing AAA rating, which could lead to a downgrade in the medium term if the proposals go off track. Fitch is currently maintaining its AAA rating. That said, the agency is conducting a thorough review, with a further announcement due at the end of this month. A negative outlook may be applied when this review is concluded.

Which, at the time of writing this blog, leaves Standard & Poor's, who had already placed the US on negative watch last month. The proposals by Congress to impose budget savings of $2.1 trillion are about half the amount S&P were seeking if it were to support a continued AAA rating. With its rivals showing their hands early, and severe pressure to maintain the current rating, S&P's decision is eagerly awaited. A downgrade now would be surprising, but it is still possible.

Whatever S&P's decision, if we were to apply sound credit management practice to the situation, some sort of downgrade must surely be handed down, especially if the proposals are not seen through. The eleventh hour agreement may improve the USA's ability to pay its bills now, but commercial credit ratings are not based on that ability alone. Businesses with a sound credit policy extend credit based on full financials, they consider the management team, the marketplace and much more. In our day-to-day lives, any business operating well beyond its means, relying on increased borrowing to fund its operations and obligations and promising to cut expenditure in the future, does not warrant a top rating. In the case of the USA's rating, we must also add into the mix the continued political game-playing, not forgetting probably the biggest factor, the current poor performance of its economy, an upturn in which is crucial to the success of the new deal.

As for what a downgrade would mean to the USA, the rest of the world, and indeed the dollar as the world's reserve currency, this is the subject of much debate, but an accurate credit rating would certainly be a good start!

Closer to home, but staying with sound credit management practice, it is very encouraging to see the ICM's UK Credit Managers' Index (CMI) moving from strength to strength. Our latest quarterly survey sees almost three times the number of participants as the previous Index, thanks to the engagement of our members, members of the ICM Think Tank and their organisations. With this level of participation, the Index promises to offer an increasingly detailed insight into the thoughts, attitudes and levels of confidence of UK credit professionals. Full analysis will be published soon, and look out for the next ICM UK CMI in Q3.

Philip King returns on 18 August.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Recent days have held mixed emotions - first driven by our government and, secondly, by my family'

Francis Maude announced a few days ago that the Government would name and shame prime contractors who fail to pay suppliers within a 30-day limit. The Prompt Payment Code was established by BIS to encourage best payment practice and by definition expose those whose behaviours might be open to question, and here is a classic opportunity to promote its existence by insisting that suppliers sign up to it. It certainly needs more publicity and this would have built on the work we're doing with BIS; instead an initiative is launched that demonstrates a seemingly lamentable absence of joined-up thinking across government departments.

A day or two later, I attended a stakeholder meeting with the Insolvency Service looking at proposed changes to the rules surrounding pre-pack administrations. Having held a number of forums, the policy team had decided to meet with stakeholders again in smaller groups to inform a 'period of reflection' before deciding on the best way forward for the detailed implementation. I was greatly encouraged by what is a rational and sensible approach that will - I hope - lead to a better outcome than would have resulted from rushing ahead regardless.

On the personal front, I recently attended a family funeral that was both poignant and sad reminding me of the uncertainty of life and the future, and bringing things into perspective. On Saturday, my daughter is getting married and this will surely be a day of pride, happiness and, yes, some tears too I suspect!

After the weekend, I'm off for a few days post-wedding recovery in the North West so I've asked Rob Beddington, the ICM's Director of Commercial Relationships, to share some thoughts with you next week, and I'll be blogging again on 18 August which, coincidentally, is the day of the next ICM Regional Roadshow at Cutlers' Hall in Sheffield. If you're in the area, I hope I'll see you there.

www.icm.org.uk

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - ' Smoke and mirrors'

The SME Finance Monitor has at last been published with the sub-title: 'To what extent do SMEs have issues accessing bank finance?'. This report, which will be undertaken quarterly, is said to be the largest and most detailed study of SME's views of bank finance ever undertaken in the UK. It stems from the Business Finance Taskforce, comprising the BBA, Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds, RBS and Santander. It is independent and the banks have no editorial control.

The report was on the agenda of the BIS Small Business Economic Forum that I attended on Monday, and which was chaired by Mark Prisk. Mike Young, the independent chair of the Survey Steering Group gave us a fascinating insight. What has been even more fascinating, however, is the variety of interpretations and responses since its publication.

The BBA said that: "most businesses are able to get the credit they need." The Labour party was quoted as saying that: "it showed that a significant minority of small businesses seeking loans are failing to get the credit they seek." Richard Tyler, from The Daily Telegraph, said: "that banks are much more selective about which firms they back and are unlikely to change their minds."

All of these are factual and - in a week when the integrity of newspapers is under scrutiny - I am not suggesting that there is anything misleading. However, few will read the full 126 page report (available here: http://www.bdrc.co.uk/business-issues/sme-finance-monitor/) so one's understanding of the report will be heavily influenced by the headlines they read.

The truth, of course, is that this is not a simple issue. Mike says in his introduction: "This report does not provide quick and easy answers to the claims and counter-claims swirling around in the debate about SMEs and banks. That is because it is an extremely complex issue, incaple of easy summary into 'guilty' or 'not guilty'. So, the report eschews glib answers and focuses on bringing out the evidence. It is for others to draw conclusions from it." The conclusions drawn by journalists and politicians will steer our thinking too, I suspect.

The one report I really liked though was in the Telegraphs piece on Tuesday quoting Manos Schizas, a senior policy advisor at the Association of Certified Accountants, who I know well and have worked with a number of times recently. It highlighted one key message of the report: "that it is vital for firms to produce accurate information." Businesses with a low external risk rating were far more likely to be offered an overdraft (93%) or loan (81%), than those with a worse than average risk rating where the 'offered what they wanted' category percentage was only 61% and 41% respectively. No surprise here and you will indulge me while I once again bang on about the 'information' debate.

In many cases, the categorisation as 'worse than average risk' will not be because the business's numbers are bad but because there aren't any numbers to go by at all!. Information facilitates the flow of credit and the current proposals to exempt micro businesses from filing accounts will simply make things worse, not better. Our petition on this subject is still open at http://bit.ly/mliWbY and I urge you to add your name to the growing list of signatories. This isn't just about credit professionals wanting more information available from Companies House or credit reference agencies so they can make better decisions more easily; it's also about helping the economy back on to its feet.



http://www.icm.org.uk/

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A week of contrasts'

It's been a mixed week with some very contrasting news and eperiences.

Being invited to speak to a Policy Specialist at No 10 and walking through 'that' famous front door was exciting and, I believe, a real watershed moment for our Institute. I felt proud that we are recognised as true experts in our field whose voice and opinion is valued. The ways of government are never easy to understand but I'm hopeful that the discussions will lead to more engagement and real activity that will raise awareness of the impact on business of late payment, and raise the profile of credit management and the critical importance of cashflow. Time will tell but if future activity levels are determined by volume of emails exchanged since the meeting, then we can expect plenty to happen!

A few days earlier we'd received good coverage in the Financial Times (third Saturday in a row!) about the Prompt Payment Code (http://www.promptpaymentcode.org.uk/) that we host and administer for BIS. The debate had been started in the FT a couple of weeks earlier in a piece that extensively quoted Martin Williams from Graydon. I'm sure most reading this will have heard of the tragic and untimely death of Martin last week. He was one of the best known and most likeable people in the credit industry - a thoroughly good guy - and, since I came to my current role five years ago, has been one of my strongest supporters (though often with useful and constructive criticism attached), always a staunch supporter of the ICM and a real expert in anything and everything 'credit'.

I came out of Downing Street last Friday and reflected that, if it had happened a week earlier, I would have shared it with Martin and thanked him for his contribution to the debate that led to the meeting being set up. The petition we have just launched - urging government to rethink its plans to exempt micro-businesses from filing accounts - came about as a result of a conversation between Martin and I after the last ICM Think Tank meeting. He was passionate about credit and business and, when we created the Think Tank a couple of years ago, he was one of the first names on my invitee list.

RIP Martin Williams, we thank you for everything you've done for the credit industry and profession, and we commit to continuing the work to which you so effectively contributed. Please go to http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/8KGN5BH to sign the petition refereed to above.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'To tweet or not to tweet'

Tweeting to Rachel Bridge of the Sunday Times, recently, made me realise just how far we have come in our social networking strategy.

We've now been actively tweeting for over a year (philipkingicm: 1,244 tweets; 389 followers / icmorg: 313 tweets; 145 followers), I've been writing this weekly blog for almost ten months (this is my 41st), and our LinkedIn group (ICM Credit Community) has amassed 1,745 members. These numbers both impress me by how quickly they've grown, and disappoint me in that so many people aren't engaging.

The reality of course is that we are all different; we all want to consume news and communicate in different ways. For some, our magazine Credit Management is the only communication they want to receive; others want email contact; and others want a mix.

And this of course isn't limited to contact from organisations like the ICM; it flows through all aspects of life. I can't remember the last time I watched the TV news yet I'm an avid listener to news on the radio; I've recently become a Kindle convert yet I always insisted I never would because I love books so much.

So what's my point? I've recently seen examples of just how powerful Twitter and LinkedIn can be in generating contact and communication (particularly with the press) that otherwise wouldn't happen. The Sunday Times coverage for the ICM ten days ago came as a direct consequence of a Twitter conversation between me and the Enterprise Editor. I'm making contact with some of our Members in an informal way that would not take place by phone or email, simply because Twitter and LinkedIn provide the opportunity to do so, and those conversations sometimes lead to deeper, 'real' conversations as a consequence.

We shouldn't be afraid to embrace new technology and ideas. Some will fail early, some will last a while then diminish (Friends Reunited is a good example), and others will get stronger - although there's already talk that Facebook's popularity is starting to decline precisely at the point when some of us are just beginning to understand its value. Twitter, too, will no doubt one day reach saturation point and outgrow itself. For now though, by being selective about who I follow, Twitter provides me with access to news, views, information, and contact that I might otherwise miss or at least not see so quickly. It is therefore useful. And I've talked to credit professionals who use these media as a way of knowing their customers better and that can pay real dividends!

http://twitter.com/philipkingicm
http://twitter.com/#!/icmorg
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=94851

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Missing the point'

So the Prompt Payment Code received some negative press at the weekend - described as 'nothing more than window dressing' and 'complete nonsense'. The ICM administers the Code on behalf of BIS and so you'd expect me to react to such comments.

Firstly, I wish the FT had asked the ICM for a view. Since we administer it, we are better placed to comment than people who have never even heard of it.

Secondly, I find it frustrating when the point is so obviously missed. The Code aims to ensure that the terms and conditions agreed between two parties are adhered to. It is NOT about whether the agreed payment terms are 30, 60 or 90 days; that is a complete red herring. What is critical to small businesses, and indeed any business, is the certainty of payment. It is this certainty that allows businesses to manage their cashflow accordingly.

I agree that the Code needs to be better promoted, and lack of compulsion is a real issue, but it should be remembered that the PPC was one of a range of initiatives launched by BERR (now BIS) in partnership with the ICM including a series of Managing Cashflow Guides of which there have now been more than 225,000 downloads.

What's equally frustrating is the lack of recognition that the real requirement is for good credit management across the whole sales life cycle from beginning to end. The challenges we have received about Code signatories almost without exception display an element of basic credit management practice being missed - order number not being quoted or terms not being agreed in advance for example. Large businesses exploiting smaller suppliers is abhorrent but those smaller businesses need to recognise their own complicity in creating the very circumstances about which they complain.

Managing Cashflow Guides

Guest Blog by Sean Feast - Managing Editor of Credit Management - 'Slap dash Olympic hash'

Hands up anyone who managed to get tickets for the Olympics? Not many that I know. I found myself yesterday in the bizarre situation of watching my bank account online and willing the balance to go down - a sign, I hoped, that my ticket application had succeeded rather than my wife buying yet another eternity ring from an online auction. Sadly - nothing. Neither the tickets - nor for that matter an eternity ring - were forthcoming.

In the car this morning I listened as seemingly hundreds of other potential punters called Five Live with their tales of woe - proclaiming undying love for a particular sport or event that they had been saving all year to see, and yet now they wouldn't. Their hopes had been cruelly dashed. Hand Ball - the game rather than the footballing offence - appears to be the only event for which tickets are still readily available. Not surprising really, given that over here we have no idea what it is, and even if we did we wouldn't play it.

As the radio presenter attempted to calm the madding crowd, someone suggested that Seb Coe would have a lot to answer for if there were seats at major events left vacant, having been given over to corporate hospitality and not used. Which set me thinking...

At a recent ICM Think Tank, we were discussing by way of idle banter during the luncheon interval the pros and cons of corporate hospitality, and how it appears that all the major sponsors are obliged to spend additional monies on tickets and entertaining their guests. One killjoy - I think it was me - then raised the issue of the Bribery Act, and how many 'guests' were inevitably going to have to decline on the grounds of breaching ethical - if not legal - rules. Which means there might still be great rows of seats left vacant where well-heeled big cheeses should be sat, which in turn means that if Lord Seb works this out quickly enough, there might still be time for me to watch the 100 metres final. Or not.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - Merlin hype misses the point

There has been plenty of hype this week with regards the banks seeming to miss their quarterly lending target to small businesses. They agreed to lend £76bn to SMEs this year, equating to £19bn per quarter, and the £16.8bn achieved to date leaves them 12% short http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-13489884.

I am conscious of not wanting to repeat earlier rants but there are one or two points worth mentioning. Firstly, you obviously can't assume one quarter is going to be the same as the previous one, so to simply multiply by four is naive. Secondly, the agreement was only announced in February when we were already well into the first quarter. Thirdly, and acknowledging that I am repeating myself, it's nonsensical to 'force' banks to lend.

The granting of credit is based on trust that the supplier will deliver the goods, services, or funds required, and that the customer will pay in accordance with the agreed terms. Banks, just like trade creditors, need to set their lending policy and criteria in order to maximise sales and profit while maintaining risk at an acceptable level. It was lending too much to customers who were insufficiently credit-worthy that contributed to the credit crunch in the first place both at a local and global level.

The 'disconnect' between the views of the banks, government, and business organisations remains, and the media takes the opportunity to exploit the differences at every turn. I for one wish we could see a more cohesive message being delivered to business. They should be more prepared to share information about their business so that lending decisions can be better informed; they should recognise that there is often cash (debtors) sitting in their business that could be released by applying good credit management principles; and they should consider other financing options beyond a loan or an overdraft.

And as for the government - and again as I have said before - they need to stop promoting the reduction of financial reporting under the misnomer of reducing red tape. Numbers still have to be produced so red tape is, at best, a fragile argument. Less information will result in less credit. It is a simple equation.

On that subject, the ICM 30-second survey has just gone live. Please let us have your views here.

Next week will be another guest blog by CreditManagement magazine's Managing Editor, Sean Feast, and I'll be back the week after.