Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Standing tall and proud'

When I said in my blog last week that it was time for credit professionals to stand up, to be noticed, and to be proud, I was talking about the value they contribute to their organisations and to the wider economy. I'm glad to say that I'm seeing a trend that exemplifies the pride I'm talking about.

I've noticed an increasing number of ICM members who include their designatory letters - AICM, MICM, MICM(Grad), or FICM - on their business cards, their email signatures, their LinkedIn profiles, and elsewhere. These letters are not just given away when someone becomes an ICM member; they have to be earned by gaining qualifications and/or having their practical experience verified, validated and reviewed.

Some might say the practice is archaic but I believe those who have earned them should be proud of their achievement and are right to use them in this way. If you don't tell people what you've achieved, who else will?

I've also seen a marked increase in the number of ICM members wearing the ICM badges we launched earlier this year. This, too, is a good way of promoting your professionalism and - if you don't have a badge - simply email icmmembership@icm.org.uk and we'll be delighted to send you one.

Don't be a shrinking violet!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Save us from madness'

Last Friday, Vince Cable announced that small firms will no longer have to produce independently audited accounts in a measure that he believes will save 42,000 businesses £40 million per year. I've always respected Vince Cable and have no doubt of his commitment to helping small business, but such a move demonstrates a naivety that verges on madness.

I agree with him when he says that 'one of the barriers to growth is the burden of regulation...it takes up time and stops busines growing and that means our economy does not grow'. That is why the ICM has indicated its support for the Daily Telegraph's 'red tape campaign'.

But please can we understand that producing accounts is not 'administration' and neither is it unnecessary red tape. Without numbers, a business cannot know how it's doing, it cannot manage its cashflow and it is far more likely to fail; without audited numbers that can be trusted, banks, creditors and financiers will not support the business and again it is far more likely to fail; and without audited numbers and the ability to access finance, the economy will not grow. Quite the opposite; it will shrink.

The Government is explaining its position by telling us that the rules for small business in respect to auditing and accounts are stricter in the UK than is required by EU law. They tell us also that for micro businesses, those with less than 10 employees, they will push for exemptions to remove the requirement to produce two sets of accounts.

And that's not all. They intend 'helping' medium sized businesses by pushing for EU restrictions to be lifted so that they no longer need their accounts independently audited and will look at relaxing the audit and accounts rules for subsidiaries.

The ICM is going to lobby vigorously against these steps and against the Government's insistence on delivering mixed messages to business. Credit fuels business. Access to credit comes from greater access to information, not less. Why is such a simple statement of fact so apparently difficult for the Government to understand?

Weekly blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - A Real Credit Community

It's fair to say that this week has been one of highs and lows.

On Wednesday I attended a funeral following the untimely death of the husband of one of our Advisory Council members. Since the sad news was shared I've been overwhelmed by the messages of support demonstrating how caring and compassionate this credit community is. Sometimes, indeed, it takes a tragedy to make us realise just how fortunate we are, and it makes me proud to be leading an organisation that is so much more than 'just' a professional body.

Talking of the credit community I attended the inaugural conference of ICTF (Association of International Credit & Trade Finance Professionals) in Brussels. The conference very definitely seemed to deliver on its promise and it was good to meet with my colleagues on the international stage and be introduced to a number of people for the first time. The ICTF has got off to a most promising start and I look forward to working closely with them as they continue to evolve.

Continuing with the 'highs', there was considerable excitement with the 0.8% rise in GDP, a quarterly jump that was twice as fast as forecasters as predicted. I consider myself a realist so don't want to dampen the enthusiasm but perhaps this rise is telling us something? Perhaps it is saying we should take heart, and be encouraged by such positive news. But it might also be saying not to get too excited, since the cuts imposed by the spending review have yet to be felt.

In the circumstances, it's almost impossible to forecast with any degree of accuracy (the only consistency in forecasts is that they're generally proved to be wide of the mark!), so we are in uncharted waters. As such, we should continue applying all the principles we know are right to manage cashflow effectively and sustain our businesses. http://www.icm.org.uk/

3rd Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - Pointless Bank Activity

In the Daily Telegraph on Tuesday, the Telegraph Business Club Editor James Hurley reported on a move by some of the major banks to have the creditworthiness of their business customers independently profiled in an attempt to defuse the row over small businesses' access to finance.

Now I'm generally supportive of banks. I don't want them to lend money to businesses that aren't creditworthy (that is, after all, how we got into this mess in the first place), and I understand the obvious dilemma of being under pressure to repair balance sheets AND lend to small businesses.

This though is disingenuous. Historically, the ICM has always fought against the raising of thresholds for modified accounts. But we all know that most small businesses file modified, abbreviated, or unaudited accounts as it is. Indeed some of them fail to file any form of accounts at all, so the outcome of this exercise is inevitable. The businesses banks won't lend to have poor credit ratings so their decisions can be easily justified!

What would be far more beneficial is if the banks spent time and energy in helping to educate and encourage small businesses to provide management accounts more readily so that more genuine, better informed decisions can be made. Transparency will, of course, be essential, and honesty on both sides would be welcome.

As I told the Daily Telegraph, I'd rather the banks were campaigning for provision of information rather than embarking on what to me seems a pointless and futile exercise.

If you'd like to read the full article click: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/yourbusiness/8000675/Report-on-bank-small-business-lending-decisions-a-pointless-exercise.html