Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - ‘Making a Difference’

This week has seen the quarterly meetings of the ICM's Advisory Council and Executive Board, and the regular forum of our Regional Representatives. We're into the second year of our governance cycle and that fact, together with a recent conversation with the editor of our Credit Management Journal, have made me think about the need for people to get involved in things.

 

Sean was telling me he'd decided to stand for election to a committee of his professional association (within the world of public relations) and questioning whether he'd be able to make a difference. My response was that he'd certainly make more difference if he stood than if he didn't, assuming of course that he was successful in the election! Stating the obvious I know but true nonetheless.

 

The reality of course is that organisations like the ICM depend on volunteers for effective governance and so much more. The willingness of individuals to give up their time and brain power is both valuable and vital. Seeing our governance in action this week has reminded me of how big a contribution they make. At times our members who get involved locally and/or nationally must question whether they make a difference but trust me they do, and their contribution and commitment are invaluable. Locally they run our network of regional branches and nationally they influence and shape our direction and strategy. In both cases they are enriching the ICM credit community and making it more powerful.

 

The countdown to next year's elections is some months away yet but let me plant a thought in the minds of those who might want to make a difference. My message is simple: when you see the invitation to stand for election to our Advisory Council early next year, please don't assume it's directed at someone else. It could just be your chance to make a difference!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A Christmas wish'

I asked a question on the ICM Credit Community group on LinkedIn recently and have had some interesting responses.

 

The question was: if Father Christmas were to bring you one gift that would really help you and/or your team be more effective in 2013, what would it be? There's still time for you to respond at http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=94851&trk=hb_side_g but posts so far can be split into three broad categories: practicalities; economic outlook; and professionalism.

 

The first comprises a wish-list including such things as: a crystal ball; a dictionary and thesaurus; more time; a cure for arthritis; better management systems; paying clients; sight of customers' management information; and a tool to force people to tell the truth! The second includes a wish for a steep economic upturn and a positive, optimistic view of the world. And the third, professionalism, covers: the desire for more networking; investment in the recruitment, retention and development of good credit people; and the resulting improvement that such investment delivers.

 

I'm afraid the ICM's ability to deliver some of the aspirations in the first category is limited, particularly in the field of arthritis (a cure for which I would certainly welcome if it were possible) but I'm pleased that our members are able to influence the second through our contact with the business/political community. I'm even more pleased that we're able to play a significant role in achieving the desires expressed in the third.

 

As I've often said in these blogs, we are all about driving professionalism, and developing services to support this ambition. As the recognised standard in credit management, our motivation is to raise the professionalism of people working in credit management by providing them with the opportunity to develop their skills, knowledge, and expertise in such a way that credit management is seen more and more as a profession in its own right.

 

I'll share some more thoughts from the discussion next week and also the wishes of the senior management team at ICM HQ; in the meantime I'm off to prepare for the ICM's Regional Roadshow in Milton Keynes where I'm looking forward to meeting a large number of our members and learn from an excellent panel of speakers.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The changing 'Face' of Debt Guidance'

Since mentioning the publication of the new OFT Debt Collection Guidance in my blog last week, I've now had chance to look through it in detail. No great surprises; it's very similar to the draft on which we were consulted some time ago and says what I guess we'd all largely expect it to say. It is, after all, only an update of the version of the document issued in June 2003.

The aspect that seems to have caused the greatest debate on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group, and elsewhere, is the OFT warning to debt collectors not to use social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook to pursue people who owe them money. I don't want to be pedantic here but I'm not sure that's exactly what it says. Actually what it says is that unfair or improper practice would include 'acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor...' which includes, as one of the examples quoted 'posting messages on social networking sites in a way that might potentially reveal that an identifiable person is being pursued for the repayment of a debt'. That's a long way from banning the use of Facebook!

I might be showing my age here but I remember lecturing ICM evening classes at Watford College in the 1980's and recall teaching about s40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which addressed the unlawful harassment of debtors and included the works: 'A person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under a contract, he harasses the other with demands for payment which, in respect of their frequency, or the manner or occasion of making any such demand, or of any threat or publicity by which any demand is accompanied, are calculated to subject him or members of his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation'.

So nothing has changed really; in those days, the example of harassment was parking a van outside someone's house with the words 'debt collector' written on the side. Surely all we're talking about here is the 2011 equivalent? There's nothing wrong with using social networking tools to find people or to learn more about them but harassing people by any means is - and must be - unacceptable. Those who have seen me present using a baseball bat as a visual aid will know that such a bat is an equally unacceptable collection tool!

I am intrigued by the following words in the Foreword: 'This guidance document is not intended to provide a basis for debtors to avoid the repayment of debts duly owed. We consider that debtors should take responsibility for engaging appropriately in the debt recovery process...'. On the one hand, I am encouraged by its inclusion; on the other, the fact that they have to write these words at all makes me think that the document is weighted heavily in favour of debtors. We shouldn't lose sight of the fact that taking on debt carries with it an obligation to repay it, and that should always be the starting point.

The Guidance carries considerable detail and Consumer Credit licence holders would do well to read it and ensure they, and any third party organisations working for them, are complying with it.