Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Catching the bus'

It's been a busy news week. I was interviewed on Jeff Randall Live on Sky News on Monday evening about the government's proposals to cap the cost of Payday Lending.  A bit like buses though, news stories of interest tend to come in twos and threes, and I had a view on the three main news stories the programme was covering.

Firstly, the Lawrence Tomlinson report containing allegations that RBS had pushed healthy small and medium-sized businesses into administration to strip their assets and then buy them back cheaply to make a profit.  As the MP Mark Garnier said in his interview: "I'm not a lawyer, but these allegations, if true, look a lot like fraud to me." How many credit professionals are looking back at bad debts incurred where they thought their decision to supply had been reasonable based on their assessment of customer risk only to be caught with a bad debt when the customer went in to insolvency and wondering if the allegations might be true?  Apart from the obvious impact on the businesses forced into insolvency, what might the wider impact on their suppliers and the economy be?

Secondly, the government was selling £900m of student loans to a debt management consortium for £160m. The loans had been taken out by students who started courses between 1990 and 1998.  Part of the reaction to the news was that debt collection companies would act irresponsibly and aggressively in recovering debts that have so far not been collected.  The Student Loans company doesn't have the best record in managing its loan book and particularly the older elements of the portfolio.  We're told the terms and conditions of the loans are not going to be changed as a result of the sale and, if engaging third parties increases the recovery of funds to the public purse, then I'm all for it.  Perhaps the debt collection companies will just apply good credit management principles and collect money that is overdue from people who can - and should - be repaying it.

Thirdly, the Chancellor's announcement that government will impose a duty on the FCA to cap the cost of payday lending.  Setting on one side the suggestion that the announcement is one of political expediency, there are bigger questions to be answered. How will the cap level be determined?  The quoting of the Australian model with its cap of 4% per month seems to overlook the 20% arrangement fee that can be charged, and the punitive penalties for late payment that can be applied.  And the last thing we want is for the cap to make short-term lenders flee the market forcing borrowers to use loan sharks instead.

I'm not averse to the principle of restricting overt profiteering that can exploit the most vulnerable but let's not forget that payday lenders aren't the only guilty parties here.  As I said to Jeff Randall, I went online and looked at what £100 payday loan for a month would cost.  I'd have to pay back £137.15. If I took an unauthorised overdraft on my current account with a High Street bank the cost would be £5 per day, capped at £95 in a month.  On another current account I looked at, the cap would be £150, and both of these accounts would also charge transaction fees on top.  On this comparison, charges of £37.15 sound a snip!

Equally big issues with payday lenders are the opportunity for borrowers to take out multiple loans with multiple lenders, the availability of repeated roll-overs, and - as I've said in this blog before - the failure of lenders to carry out adequate affordability checks ahead of granting loans.

Back to my buses analogy, I guess next week will be devoid of any significant news and we'll be back to following the exploits of celebrities and their social lives!

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Changing the mindset of start-ups'

I've had some interesting meetings this week with BIS officials and Ministers, and other organisations, talking about late payment. No doubt you'll have seen David Cameron's announcement in October that a consultation was going to be launched looking at the issue, and I mentioned it in this blog column a few weeks ago.

One of the meetings was a round table involving a large number of organisations looking for practical steps that might help SMEs to manage their cashflow better. There's no doubt that the required change in culture that I often refer to is needed throughout the supply chain. Big businesses need to take a responsible approach in dealing with their suppliers, and smaller businesses need to apply basic good credit management principles.

Therein though lies the challenge. For many micro businesses, cashflow only becomes important when it runs short, and that's no surprise. If I'm trying to start a business, I'm bound to be more worried about finding customers and delivering my service or product than I am about such things as agreeing payment terms, invoicing accurately and promptly, and chasing unpaid amounts.

But this is what needs to change - we need to make the mindset of start-up businesses one that recognises the importance of cash from day one, that applies the basic principles that credit professionals understand so well. Unless that happens, too many businesses will never grow beyond the micro stage and too many businesses will fail. So what's the answer? I am not sure I know - I wish I did - but I'm glad to be engaged in the debate and to be working with others in looking for solutions.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Harnessing support for exports'

You might have seen that this is Export Week designed to draw attention to exporting and the need for businesses in the UK to do more of it. The government has set some ambitious targets for 2020: achieving exports totalling £1 trillion and having 25% of businesses exporting, the current level is 20%.

By coincidence, the guest speaker at the ICM's Credit Industry Think Tank on Tuesday was Robert Hurley from UK Trade & Investment who shared some interesting information and facts about particular export markets and the work of UKTI, interspersed with some personal anecdotes from his long experience in exporting before joining the government organisation.

UKTI works with UK-based businesses to ensure their success in international markets and provides support in four key areas: business planning, market research, market promotion & publicity, and market visits. Although I've had significant contact with the organisation over recent years, I hadn't realised the depth or breadth of the service and support they offer.

One particular service that caught my attention was the 'Business Opportunity Alerts'. A business can register on the website stating its sector and the markets it is interested in, and it will receive alerts of any relevant opportunities that arise. I don't know how many of the 4.8 million businesses in the UK have registered for the service, and I don't know how many businesses are even aware of the facility, but I'd hazard a guess that for both it's a pretty small proportion, and that's a shame.

Exporting is a really good way to grow our economy, and it's good for business generally, so services like this need a high profile. I've talked in previous blogs and elsewhere about the disappointing lack of awareness among the business community of various government schemes and this is another example.

A huge amount of good work is put into supporting businesses, especially the small and medium ones, and it's a pity when that effort goes to waste. More needs to be done to bring such things to the attention of business owners and government needs to get smarter. In the meantime, if you know a small business that's even thinking about selling into overseas markets then you could do worse than point them to www.ukti.gov.uk

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - Facing facts'

I've been following the recent furore about Tesco's trial of face-scanning technology in its 450 petrol stations with interest. Apparently, the technology allows the camera to identify the customer's gender and approximate age and then deliver an appropriately targeted advert.

The targeting of adverts on web sites based on previous surfing history is well documented, the monitoring of spending through loyalty cards allowing targeted promotions has been around for several years, and the offering of free Wi-FI to facilitate the capture of data and routes to market is becoming ubiquitous. For a long time we've been told that the average person is viewed on CCTV an estimated 70 times each day even if the awareness falls into our subconscious.

This somehow seems to be a step further but is surely no surprise in an age of ever increasing technological sophistication and complexity. Just this week, I realised I'd left home without putting my pen in my suit pocket. Did I panic? No, I realised that almost all my note-taking, planning and writing is on my iPad and I rarely use a pen these days. I'd never have believed that would be the case even a couple of years ago but I genuinely couldn't imagine anything different now.

And so it is with credit management. I was at the ICTF conference recently which brings together credit professionals from across Europe. One of the sessions there was a workshop looking at the use of technology and how to identify and source the best solutions. As I travel around talking to credit people I'm made aware of the advances in the software and tools being used and, equally importantly, of its integration into legacy systems, processes and procedures. In most cases, it's about more than being increasingly efficient or saving cost, it's about being more effective and adding more value to the business.

Whether we like it or not, the evolution will continue and - to some extent at least - we have to embrace it if we want to maintain our position as individuals and organisations. Do I care if Tesco is working out my age and gender so that it can show me an advert I'm more likely to be interested in? When I think about it rationally, not really!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Banking on insurance'

There was an interesting piece in The Times on Monday talking about business lending by banks and a proposal for a Guaranteed Repayment Insurance Policy. Apparently the scheme would involve the issue of an insurance policy that could be purchased by a small business and offered to banks as security for a loan. The Government's new Business Bank is considering offering a subsidy to insurers under which it would underwrite 15 percent of the cost of any default.

The theory is that such an offering would remove one of the obstacles to business lending when the collateral demanded by the banks is so high that the taking out of a loan becomes prohibitive or too personally risky for the borrower. Small business owners would, it is thought, be more comfortable paying the premium than putting their home on the line as security.

BIS says it is only currently looking at the proposal and has made no commitment, and I agree it is right to be looking at new and innovative ways to increase the flow of money into a much needed part of the economy. I can see the attraction to a small business whose owner is fearful of losing his house if the enterprise fails but, given the paucity of cash available to businesses in their earliest days, finding additional money to pay for an insurance policy on top of all the other overheads will be a challenge.

As always the devil will be in the detail and I have no idea what the pricing model might be but I'm afraid I'm a bit sceptical. It already worries me that someone can start a limited company with no business knowledge, no awareness of their obligations and responsibilities as a director, and no capital. This scheme would, I fear, encourage the taking on of an additional expense in return for lower personal risk at a time when the business is least able to afford it. The consequence of that will be reduced profits - or increased losses - and a greater propensity for failure.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Neither borrower nor a lender be?'

I was in Basel earlier this week for the ICTF Conference. It's always a good opportunity to catch up with credit professionals from around Europe and beyond, and great to hear some of the issues being faced and how they're being addressed.

 

Flights and travel gave me the opportunity to read the FCA's recently published consultation: 'Detailed proposals for the FCA regime for consumer credit'. We'll be providing the opportunity for members to submit comments through our November ‘In Brief’, and I won't go into any detail on the 193 pages, nor the 387 pages of the Appendices here. I do though want to make just one comment about the FCA's stated intention to focus on the Payday Loans sector.

 

I've written several blogs over recent months arguing that the OFT should, in its final year, take action over the absence of evidence that affordability tests are being adequately carried out by payday lenders. I've consistently asserted that this is the key failure of the market and should be addressed with vigour. It should, after all, be the determinant in all credit decisions regardless of sector, size or nature.

I've given up hoping that the OFT is going to take any serious action on this in its final days but I was encouraged to read these words in the consultation: "Our proposals.........are based on the principle that money should only be lent to a consumer if the consumer has the ability to repay and in a sustainable way." And in his foreword, FCA Chief Executive Martin Wheatley says: "The OFT affordability guidance is good, but the OFT’s own research shows too few firms implement it. We will put it into our rules and guidance, and enforce this."

 

Martin's last two words are the most important - let's hold the FCA to account and ensure it delivers.

 

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Better Late than Never'

There's been a late payment furore this week, in my world at least. I was interviewed on 5Live Investigates on Sunday and then on Monday the Prime Minister announced that BIS is going to launch a consultation on the subject.

In the midst of Cameron's announcement he repeated the suggestion made by Vince Cable in August that there might be penalties or fines for late payment. Quite apart from the debate about the practicalities of implementing such a step, the point missed is that the Late Payment legislation introduced in 1998 and strengthened by subsequent Statutory Instruments, most recently in March this year, allows for a fixed fee to be charged and supplemented by additional recovery costs for invoices paid late. The Institute's press release issued on Monday makes the point that the late payment charges are, by definition, a fine or levy for late payment.

Lord Digby Jones entered the fray stating that the Prompt Payment Code wasn't effective. He said it was merely a nice statement of intent. But that's exactly what it is: a voluntary commitment to treat suppliers fairly and pay them according to the terms agreed! If it had the teeth that he is demanding, it would cease to be a voluntary code. Now I'm not saying it couldn't be improved nor am I disagreeing with the sentiment for other or more stringent measures but I do get frustrated when people say something isn't working when it's doing what it says on the tin!

Some critics have suggested that I'm personally responsible for the Code and its defender-in-chief. I'm not, the ICM simply hosts and administers it for government but let's not dismiss the benefits out of hand: nearly 1,500 organisations have signed up, including 72 of the FTSE100; many have made fundamental changes to improve their internal systems and processes; and a dialogue has started where conversations didn't previously exist. If the Code didn't exist, by the way, the debate wouldn't be taking place and the issue wouldn't be getting airtime in the way it is. These are tangible benefits and should neither be ignored nor trivialised.

The fact is that the Prompt Payment Code was introduced as a measure to drive a change in culture complementing other measures such as the late payment legislation, naming and shaming by business organisations, and good credit management practice which - all too often - is missing from business relationships. This last point was driven home to me at an ICM Regional Roadshow in London yesterday when attendees heard about the breadth of influence credit management has, and the value it adds, across the entire business.

Credit management isn't just about collecting cash from recalcitrant customers. Good credit management starts before an order is even received by assessing the risk of a potential customer, establishing its identity and status, ensuring that it is good for the sums of credit likely to be incurred, submitting invoices correctly and promptly, understanding its invoice processing and approval systems so that they can be met, and taking swift action if payment isn't going to arrive when it's expected.

I'm capturing a huge amount of activity in a single sentence and not doing it justice but my point is this: we have to change the culture to one where treating suppliers fairly is part of the corporate responsibility agenda and we have to stamp out exploitation of small businesses by organisations that wilfully take advantage of their supplier base but that's not the whole story. We also have to help businesses to help themselves by getting the basics right. Unless we do that, we'll never see the improvement we all seek.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Why I am not Prime Minister'

This is going to be a shorter blog than I often write and it's more of a question based on my confusion than an exposition of my views! The ministerial reshuffle announced this week includes a move that leaves me perplexed, as did an earlier decision.

In September 2012, Michael Fallon was appointed Business and Enterprise Minister replacing Mark Prisk who'd held the role for a while before that, and was moving to a housing portfolio. So far so good, and Michael Fallon made a good early impression and has been instrumental in successfully driving the prompt payment debate. Then, inexplicably to me, in March 2013 the role of Minister of State for Energy was added to his portfolio meaning he was a minister in two departments: BIS (Department for Business Innovation & Skills) and DECC (Department for Energy & Climate Change). I couldn't work out then why a minister would be given a role across two separate departments given the workload and demands of one but that's probably why I'm not Prime Minister!

In this week's reshuffle, Michael Fallon has been made Industry & Energy Minister, I presume straddling the same two departments (BIS and DECC), and Matt Hancock has been appointed Minister for Skills & Enterprise working in BIS and the Department for Education. I understand such areas as late payment will be moving to Matt Hancock's remit. I've enjoyed working with Michael Fallon and his team. I think he's been effective, and I'm sure Matt Hancock will be similarly so but my question is this: why is attention to such an issue as late payment being potentially diluted through its responsibility being added to such a diverse portfolio? An issue which affects all businesses, particularly small ones, and impacts massively on the wider economy surely deserves better.

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Selective Hearing'

I listened to a speech by a politician recently that was genuinely disappointing. It would be unfair and inappropriate to name him, and pointless because my observations are more about the general principles than the detail in this case. He was talking about a subject that I know well and have been closely involved in for some time so I know for certain that at least three of the statistics and statements presented and quoted were totally incorrect but they served to underline the failings of a current policy.

 

So why did the content of this speech lack credibility. Was it because researchers weren’t thorough enough, was it because the speech wasn’t adequately proof-read, or was it – more cynically – because the inaccurate data better supported the case being made? I may be naive, but I think it rare for politicians to deliberately set out to mislead. However, I also believe that expediency often leads to the use of selective and convenient use of data to ensure a particular point is made or argument justified.

 

Two thoughts. First, I really wish politicians could learn to resist the urge to spend their time looking for negatives that will allow them to score political points. I want to hear positive constructive messages that will benefit business and the economy. Second, I want to be able to trust what I hear and believe it to be credible. I’d rather be convinced by an objective argument considering the pros and cons of a proposal than feel I am being manoeuvred into a position that is unconvincing, where only one side of the debate is aired and where the underlying intention seems to be to undermine existing or previous policy rather than present serious alternatives.

 

I’ve missed attending the party conferences this year but I certainly haven’t missed the less savoury elements of point scoring, sound-byte grabbing, and economy with the truth!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Second time lucky?'

I had the pleasure of attending the ExPP e-invoicing Summit in Warsaw earlier this week to present on the EU Late Payment Directive that came into force earlier this year. The lack of awareness of the Directive was no surprise, given that only 9 EU member states met the transposition deadline of 16 March this year and – six months on – I understand Belgium and Germany have still not done so.

 

The Directive is intended to drive a change in culture encouraging organisations to pay promptly and to discourage them from looking to demand excessive payment terms. I’ve expressed previously my view that it is unlikely to have the desired effect because the 2000 Directive had little impact and the new one isn’t that different, and because it tends to benefit organisations who take legal action and recover additional sums on top of the original debt. That’s all well and good but it comes after the event and is little comfort to a small business that’s failed due to a cashflow crisis when what it needed was the original invoices settled on time.

 

Fundamentally, small businesses tend not to know about the legislation, those that know about it aren’t sure how to use it, and those that know how to use it are reluctant to do so for fear of upsetting their customer. Nevertheless, as a tool in the armoury against late payment it has its place and it contains some measures that may yet prove to be of real benefit. That’s for another day though.

So what’s the connection between late payment and e-invoicing? I often preach about the need for small businesses to get the basics right, and the basics include invoicing promptly and correctly. One of the benefits of e-invoicing is that the system can instil a level of discipline into the process such that the correct fields are populated, and it is submitted in a format fit for processing. Also, many systems will provide confirmation of receipt and allow the supplier to monitor process through the payment system and have visibility of when funds can be expected.

 

I sometimes hear criticism when a large organisation issues an edict to its supplier base insisting that it adopts a particular system for submission of invoices. It’s accused of arrogance and abusing its power by forcing small suppliers to adopt a system they might prefer not to. Possibly so but, given that inaccurate and late invoicing is one of the biggest obstacles to getting prompt payment, let’s not dismiss the benefits out of hand.

 

Seems to me there are two sides to every argument!

Weekly blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Sharing the golden nuggets!'

I spent a day this week at the ICM's Quality in Credit Management Best Practice Conference in London. The event was for organisations that have achieved, are on the journey towards achieving, or aspire to achieve the Quality in Credit Management accreditation award. What a great day.

 

I'm not going to bang on about the benefits of the Quality in Credit Management Award accreditation scheme (though clearly I could) but rather I'm keen to talk about the benefits of sharing best practice. When you get a group of people in a room who are at the top of their game - either personally or from an organisational perspective - it's amazing what comes out.

 

At the conference, we heard a series of speakers sharing their experiences and giving examples of best practice. Of course, what works for one organisation might not work for another, but hearing and filtering ideas is a great opportunity to improve, and helps meet one of the objectives of QICM, that of facilitating continuous improvement for people and organisations.

 

Some of the ideas were incredibly simple and others far more sophisticated. For example, we heard about the huge impact of introducing very simple and cheap 'music on hold' which made a great positive impression on both customers and the internal organisation.

 

More than one presenter talked about their plans to educate customers to improve their own credit management processes and procedures on the basis that, if they were more effective at collecting cash, they'd be better able to settle invoices promptly. A good example of sharing best practice with the wider business community and particularly with SMEs and micro-businesses who may lack relevant experience and expertise.

 

We saw some impressive dashboards and an explanation of how they can be used to best effect. Letting commercial people understand the value of overdue debt in terms of a number of new salesmen or replacement delivery vehicles, for example, is not a new idea but is very powerful.

 

Afternoon presentations addressed how to energise and motivate teams through periods of change and how to make step changes in performance. Some innovative and invigorating ideas on how to create a culture that is focused, cohesive and driven. The case studies came from large organisations but contained concepts that could be adopted in a variety of environments.

 

What's even more interesting about events like this is that people can contribute more than they realise. Participants turn up expecting to learn from the wisdom and experience of the presenters without realising how good they are themselves, and what nuggets they also have to share. Whether we call it networking or by some other grand name, sharing what we know, what we do, and what we've learnt is one of the most powerful business tools, and we should do more of it.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - ‘Making a Difference’

This week has seen the quarterly meetings of the ICM's Advisory Council and Executive Board, and the regular forum of our Regional Representatives. We're into the second year of our governance cycle and that fact, together with a recent conversation with the editor of our Credit Management Journal, have made me think about the need for people to get involved in things.

 

Sean was telling me he'd decided to stand for election to a committee of his professional association (within the world of public relations) and questioning whether he'd be able to make a difference. My response was that he'd certainly make more difference if he stood than if he didn't, assuming of course that he was successful in the election! Stating the obvious I know but true nonetheless.

 

The reality of course is that organisations like the ICM depend on volunteers for effective governance and so much more. The willingness of individuals to give up their time and brain power is both valuable and vital. Seeing our governance in action this week has reminded me of how big a contribution they make. At times our members who get involved locally and/or nationally must question whether they make a difference but trust me they do, and their contribution and commitment are invaluable. Locally they run our network of regional branches and nationally they influence and shape our direction and strategy. In both cases they are enriching the ICM credit community and making it more powerful.

 

The countdown to next year's elections is some months away yet but let me plant a thought in the minds of those who might want to make a difference. My message is simple: when you see the invitation to stand for election to our Advisory Council early next year, please don't assume it's directed at someone else. It could just be your chance to make a difference!

Weekly blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The price of success'

I've written several blogs about the payday loan industry in recent months saying, in summary, that I don't believe the concept of short term loans is fundamentally wrong and that emotion sometimes over-rides objectivity. But that does not mean that poor practice is ever acceptable. In particular I've ranted about the absence of evidence that affordability tests were being carried out and said the OFT should, in its final year, focus on this particular element.

Wonga's announcement that its pre-tax profits were up by 35% and bad debts were up by 89% has brought the sector back into sharp focus and - reading reports and commentaries - two things have struck me.

The first is Ian King, the Times Business Editor, observing that Wonga is one of the good guys in an industry that has appalling practices; by way of example he cites that it will not allow its customers to "roll" their loans more than three times and observes that the interest rates they charge are, for example, far lower than those incurred by running up an unauthorised bank overdraft. In my view, being cheaper than someone else isn't necessarily justification but it's certainly true and mitigates against some of the more emotional headlines we see. Indeed, elsewhere in the paper it's reported that loans cannot be rolled over more than twice and that Wonga stops racking up interest after 60 days to prevent debts spiralling too far out of control.

More worrying though is the quote from Wonga's Chief Executive, Errol Damelin, who is reported as saying Wonga loans were too small to be a significant problem and "it's very unlikely that a £200 or a £400 loan is what gets people into a financial mess". Perhaps by itself such a loan value won't, but as part of a vulnerable financial situation it can play a key role especially if it's taken out in desperation and as a last resort. I'd like to think Wonga is an exemplar in carrying out adequate and effective affordability checks but come on, Mr Damelin, get real - £400 MIGHT NOT be a problem for you but it could well be for some of your customers and potential customers!

 

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Stepping out of the bath'

After the good personal news I shared in my blog last week, there's been some heartening news on the economy this week.

The CBI's latest quarterly poll shows that the services sector, which accounts for two thirds of the UK economy, is growing at its fastest rate for six years. Last week, the Office for National Statistics lifted its second-quarter estimate for GDP growth from 0.6 per cent to 0.7 per cent. The EEF, the manufacturers' organisation, said that for the first time more members were reporting that the cost of new borrowing lines was falling than those reporting it was rising. The Bank of England's Deputy Governor suggested the Bank was sending a 'clear signal' that interest rates would not be raised any time soon reiterating the commitment made early in his reign by the new Governor Mark Carney.

 

The editor of our own magazine, Credit Management, drew attention to a number of other positive indices in his column in the September issue which hit doormats at the end of last week so perhaps the CBI is right in interpreting their numbers as evidence of a further build-up of momentum. Certainly, the conversations I'm having with businesses and organisations suggest an underlying sense of confidence that was missing a few months ago.

 

Few people seem to be overly buoyant but they do at least seem to  be moving from A glass half-empty to glass half-full mentality. In the early days of this recession when the debate was raging as to whether it would be V or U shaped, I remember one economist saying it would be bath-tub shaped, with the economy bouncing along the bottom for a prolonged period. It was a description I shamelessly stole and has proved to be pretty accurate.

 

I don't think we're off the bottom yet but I think we're looking upwards now rather than constantly looking behind us, and it does feel like momentum is building. Knowing how important confidence is to achieving recovery, let's do our bit by talking ourselves out of the bath tub.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Mixed Fortunes'

The last week and a half has been pretty amazing. I returned from a great two-week break touring the Scottish Highlands, I've had my 57th birthday, and my first grandchild has been born! The North West of Scotland has breathtaking scenery and it was brilliant to spend some quality time relaxing with Mary, my long-suffering wife. Apart from one afternoon looking at late payment issues and talking to a Financial Times journalist, I genuinely avoided emails and voicemails and it made a pleasant change. I'll skirt round my birthday since I've had so many of them now that there's not much to say!

The really exciting news is the arrival of my grandson which has brought back all the emotion that accompanied the arrival of our own children 29, 26, and 21 years ago, and has reminded me of the miracle that childbirth represents. My blogs aren't often personal but I couldn't let this event pass by without a mention, although I won't pick up my phone and start imposing pictures on you as I might if you were here!

On my office desk when I returned to ICM HQ was the StepChange Debt Charity Statistical Yearbook for 2012 and it brought me back to the real world with a bump. On average across the year, someone sought help from the charity every 78 seconds either online or by phone and we have to remind ourselves that StepChange is just one route for debt advice. There are numerous organisations offering support, help, and advice and – looking at the most recent Credit Action debt statistics – I see that Citizens Advice Bureaux in England and Wales dealt with 7,824 new debt problems every working day during the year ending March 2013. Worse still, the letter accompanying the StepChange report reveals that, for about a quarter of the clients they advised last year, they were unable to suggest a way forward because the client lacked the means to cover essential living costs while insolvency was inappropriate for their circumstances.

To help some of these clients StepChange has launched a new 'token payment' service, an interim measure of short-term relief allowing clients time to get their affairs in order where there is a reasonable expectation that their circumstances will improve in the reasonably short-term. Token payments, of course, are not new but this approach to their administration is, and it coincides with a pilot 'Sustainable Debt Advice Project' run by AdviceUK which is now being rolled out more widely.

Just as we all have cause to celebrate from time to time, so we all face problems and many customers get into financial difficulty because of a sudden or dramatic change in circumstances. We want to be paid what we are owed, and solutions giving customers who want to pay some temporary breathing space are to be welcomed, especially if the longer-term prospects are improved as a result.

Finally, it would be remiss of me not to thank Charles Mayhew, Sue Chapple, and Sue Kettle for their excellent guest blogs while I was away. I appreciate their support and enjoyed their contributions.

Guest blog by Sue Kettle, Director of Membership and Support Services of the ICM - 'Love and Passion? Can this really be credit management?'

As Philip’s guest blogger, I deliberated long and hard on the theme and title of my blog. Would it be appropriate? Will it be taken in the context it’s meant? 

 

It didn’t take me long to feel at ease when I spotted a recent discussion posted on LinkedIn by a fellow colleague entitled ‘I love…’. With a smile and no real surprise I began to read the responses to the post that confirmed my thoughts. “I love the challenge” and “I love making a difference” to quotea couple.

From day one of joining ICM, and for the past 14 years, it has been so apparent from conversations with our members that the passion, commitment and excitement for credit management is boundless.

 

My early career was spent in a variety of industry sectors and I can honestly say the only passion and love I ever saw in those days was from an 11 o’clock diet coke break or an early finish.

 

One story that has always stuck with me, and I won't mention any names, was during my early days in membership when an individual who as applying to become a Member, who was so passionate about his job and his enthusiasm to join the credit community, he felt the need to call me from the bath to tell me he had reduced the companies DSO to 12 days, would this contribute to him achieving recognition as a credit professional?  To this day, he is now a long serving Member, I can't look at him with a straight face!

 

I feel, from my experience, I can honestly say credit professionals love their jobs with a passion and they are a breed that are not precious about their knowledge they have a longing desire to share and help others develop in the same way they have.

 

To all in the credit community let's nurture the professionals of the future to continue this infectious passion.

 

Yes, this really is Credit Management.

 

Sue Kettle

Director of Membership and Support Services

 

Guest blog by Sue Chapple, Head of Revenue Management of EDF Energy Plc - 'No pain no gain?'

For three weeks in July every year, our household becomes totally and utterly obsessed with the Tour de France.  This is a relatively new phenomenon, which has crept up on us over the last five years – but still now, our total immersion with the event, takes even us by surprise.  The ‘phone goes unanswered, ironing builds to a veritable monster, the weeds gang up on us and the dog has to remind us he wants to be fed and walked!

 

So as the 2013 edition draws to a spectacular close and we are left feeling bereft, I wonder what, if anything, I can draw from the experience.

 

I suppose the overriding observation, every year, is the total and unswerving dedication to the cause.  The absolute commitment from every single rider, to every kilometre of the race, regardless of pain, weather, or gradient is remarkable.  Does this type of dedication exist at all, outside of the sporting arena?

 

Is it possible to harness just a tiny bit of this focus and desire and capture it for our own worlds? Or are the participants, by definition, simply a special breed that cannot be ‘recreated’ in any other environment?  Could we look at the Sky Team approach to ‘process improvement’ which, in the words of the great (Sir) Dave Brailsford, is all about marginal gain: if you work, methodically, to remove variances over which you have control and which have a negative impact, and aim to do 100 things one percent better – the impact in any walk of life will at the very least be noticeable and at best, incredible.

 

So far so good, now I wonder how my team will feel about the lycra suits………

 

Next week Philip King’s guest blogger will be Sue Kettle, Director of Membership & Support Services for the ICM.

Guest blog by Charles Mayhew FICM, Director of Moreton Smith Limited –‘Brass Bands and Bacon Rolls’

I was delighted to be asked to be a guest blogger by Philip some months ago, and was wondering what I could write.

How the late payment act is working? Perhaps some interesting stories about collecting debts in the Middle East and so on? So while I was reflecting on a topic, I started remembering all the fascinating people I have met in our Industry, and of course being involved in International collections, many different nationalities.

I was recently made a Fellow of the ICM and a very proud one also. So therefore, having been the recipient of what should be perceived as an Oscar, I am hoping to thank a few people and share some stories of my 20 years in Credit - so far! It’s not over by any means.

It all started in 1994 just after I returned from living and working in Abu Dhabi with my wife and two (then) young children. I was interviewed by a distinguished American Gentleman, Stanley Tulchin of STA Associates who introduced me to the collections industry. His favourite saying was “Volume without yield is an unnecessary expense”. Wise advice from a wise man. Stanley was a great supporter of the American Collectors Association and also the NACM in the USA and insisted that we became heavily involved with the equivalent UK organisation which of course we did. I was lucky enough to travel to Chicago for the NACM conference, the same as the Annual ICM at Gaydon but much larger.

I compared notes on the ICM with Ted Brown, who was spotted in window of the Hotel opposite me in a John Cleese type moment. We couldn’t believe the massive brass band marching through the exhibition halls, the amount of people in attendance, and the lavish stands that many companies had invested in. I also attended the New Orleans NACM conference a few years later, and that was an experience. Then coming back to the UK I remember well the Liverpool and Merseyside conference and Lynne Mills enticing us all to arrive promptly with the lure of Bacon Rolls, which were delicious. It was 1998 before I became an MICM and I actually remember saying to my older brother, himself a Lieutenant Commander in the Royal Navy, that I eventually had letters after my name.

My Mum was also impressed! I joined Richard Moreton and Mark Smith in 2003 and was grateful for my time at STA but the bright lights of London beckoned, and the opportunity to become a shareholder in a growing business. Again my previous colleagues at STA were household names, who I gained invaluable experience from. Colin Thomas and Kevin Terrel, all with great sayings such as “companies owe money but people pay bills” (I don’t think that’s copyrighted though).

Philip King, Brenda Linger, Stuart Hopewell, Larry Coltman were all encouraging me along with Richard Seadon especially to apply for my fellowship. 

I am delighted that I did, it has made me even more passionate about the industry we work in, and what it has always allowed me to do is to reflect on how many good people have had an influence on my career so far. Over the years and travelling around to see many credit managers as I do, people are always quick to give an opinion on the ICM. Another saying is you only get out what you put in.

I will continue to support our professional body, and perhaps even more importantly the people who are in our industry. Socialising with them is also a healthy part of it, we call it networking. Have a great summer.

Charles Mayhew FICM

 

Next week Philip King’s guest blogger will be Sue Chapple, Head of Revenue Management of EDF Energy Plc.

 

 

Weekly blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Firing the imagination'

I talked last week about the flurry of consultations being launched by government ahead of the summer holidays and, guess what, there have been even more since I wrote those words.  It feels like I have spent every waking hour of the last ten days ploughing through page after page of government documents and preparing questionnaires and summaries to share with our members so they can comment and offer their views.

The latest to hit my inbox was HMRC's consultation document: 'Sharing and publishing data for public benefit', a set of proposals that "form a significant development in HMRC's Open Data Strategy".  Judged by the title, you wouldn't imagine this has much to excite credit professionals but ­ as is so often the case ­ there are nuggets hidden away that are very interesting.  Indeed, I would go far as to say that this one has genuinely excited my imagination. Why is that?

In amongst the detail, the paper suggests the possibilities of releasing of basic non-financial VAT registration data as public data, and sharing more detailed VAT registration data on a more restricted and controlled basis for specific purposes, such as credit referencing.  It also considers whether VAT registration data could provide a foundation for private sector business registers.  It is this last point that lights my fire! I'm old enough to remember the Business Names Register (I think it was called) which allowed a supplier to identify a business.  It ceased to exist years ago and no doubt someone reading this will remember better than me the background as to why, and when.  Since its demise, the ability to identify a business that trades as a sole trader or partnership has been incredibly difficult, and the proportion of businesses on which the credit reference agencies are able to report is incredibly low because of the dearth of data available to them.  I know the VAT threshold is currently £79,000 so the smallest businesses wouldn't be picked up but it would still be a huge step forward.  According to HMRC, around 800,000 VAT registered businesses are not incorporated so making basic information available to credit reference agencies would at least enable a business's existence, location, legal status, and trade classification to be verified.

Of course we'd prefer to have financial information as well but let's keep our feet on the ground; that's not going to happen any time soon.  In the meantime, please let me know what you think (the ICM In-Brief newsletter published on 14 August will have a link to the document but it can also be found here so we can make HM Government aware of our views.

I'm off to Scotland for my summer break shortly and I'm grateful to Charles Mayhew, Sue Chapple, and Sue Kettle who've agreed to do me the honour of writing guest blogs while I'm away.  If you too are heading for some time of relaxation in the coming weeks then make the most of them.  This is the only time in the year when I genuinely turn off emails (despite what I may tell Mrs K at other times!).  I'll look forward to returning refreshed and re-charged.