Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Unearthing a hidden gem'

The government published its Information Economy Strategy last week (it can be found here: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/information-economy-strategy).  The 57 pages set out the vision for a "thriving UK information economy enhancing our national competitiveness with, among other things, a strong, innovative, information sector exporting UK excellence to the world; UK businesses......confidently using technology, able to trade online, seizing technological opportunities and increasing revenues in domestic and international markets".  The intent and programme are ambitious yet vital if we are going to stay at the forefront of technological change and make the most of the opportunities that change will present in the years ahead.  I count myself among those who remember computer printouts being introduced as working tools in the late 1970s and I'm still struggling to grasp the concept of 3D printing as a form of manufacture so, like you, I've experienced the huge change over the past few years.  Indeed, it's not so long ago that the idea of me writing these words on an iPad sat in a car would have seemed the stuff of science fiction!

Anyway, back to the government report which has a real gem hidden away on page 23. It says government wants to make it easier for suppliers by encouraging the use of electronic invoicing.  Its aim is for central government to use electronic invoicing for all transactions.  While not mandating suppliers at this stage, it will look at ways to spread best practice and will track progress.  It goes on to say that, to realise the full benefits of e-invoicing, it is important that systems are easy to install and use, and the pricing is flexible enough to suit the needs of diverse businesses.

The ICM is increasingly engaging with the UK National e-Invoicing Forum which pulls together a number of e-invoicing providers, business organisations, and others with an interest in promoting the use of e-invoicing.  One of the interesting outputs from the Prompt Payment Code (hosted and administered for BIS by the ICM) is that the majority of complaints against signatories end up identifying administrative issues in either the raising and submission of the invoice, or the authorisation process at the recipient's end. I regularly talk to SMEs, and particularly micro-businesses, who still appear to fail to see the importance of raising invoices promptly and in line with the requirements of the paying organisation.  It can be a pain to jump through hoops to meet exacting demands of a customer but that pain fades into insignificance when set against the pain of running out of cash!

Implementing e-invoicing systems may seem daunting but, once in place, the whole process can become seamless allowing payment to hit on the agreed and expected day without further intervention.  The report is right in identifying that systems must be easy to install and use, and it's encouraging that providers have committed to look at ways to improve interoperability and accessibility.  Anything that helps add to the certainty of payment is good for business and will help support economic growth through improved cashflow.  The Prompt Payment Code (www.promptpaymentcode.co.uk) drives better payment behaviour.  Good credit management practice is vital, and e-invoicing too can play its part.  I'm looking forward to working with the UKNEF and the e-invoicing providers in the months ahead as their products evolve and awareness is raised.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Going for growth'

Lord Young published his Growing Your Business - A report on Growing Micro Businesses on Monday and it's a good read with some insightful views. I've spent some time with Lord Young as part of my involvement on the board of the Start-Up Loans Company, and I never cease to be amazed at his enthusiasm and energy. I'd love to think I will be so sprightly when I am 81! 

 

The report can be found at the link above and three things strike me in particular. Firstly, the proposals regarding public sector procurement starting on page 19. Whatever government might say, or intend, the reality is that many small businesses find procuring for public sector contracts bureaucratic and daunting. Their perception is that large organisations will be favoured in the process and - whether they're right or wrong - we all know that perception is, for them, reality. The removal of the PQQ system for contracts below €200,000 makes very good sense, as does the 'single passport' proposal allowing pre-qualification data to be entered once and then - after approval by one authority - apply to all bids across multiple authorities.

 

Secondly, the recognition that "Few small firms understand the importance of cash flow particularly when applying for a first bank loan." I guess the fact that the ICM/BIS Managing Cashflow Guides have been downloaded more than 450,000 times since they were launched in 2008 and are seeing regular and substantial monthly increases reinforces this point.

 

Thirdly, the recommendation that the upper age restriction be removed from the Start-Up Loans scheme. Originally set at 18-24, then in January changed to 18-30, this latest suggestion would allow anyone to benefit from what has been a hugely successful initiative. Almost 4,000 businesses have been started, receiving loans totalling nearly £20m, and the creation of a private company to manage the scheme is a radical and

 

innovative alternative to previous government propositions. The businesses receiving funding, support and mentoring have the chance of a real kick-start towards their entrepreneurial vision and aspirations. At the start of 2012, micro businesses (0-9 employees) accounted for 32% of private sector employment and 20% of private sector turnover. Growing the contribution of such businesses can only be good news for the economy and add to the increased confidence that is starting to emerge.

 

The report's 54 pages contain much more, including the proposal for Growth Vouchers encouraging businesses to obtain support and advice, and just as I am proud to have been engaged on the Start-Up Loans Company Board since its inception, I am also proud that the ICM is listed as one of the organisations with which Lord Young engaged in the writing of the report.

 

Finally, it would be remiss of me not to mention the fact that the Institute of Credit Management won another PR award last week. The press release announcing the win can be found here and I'm delighted at the recognition of what we, together with our PR agency Gravity London, have achieved in raising the profile of professional credit managers and the vital role they play in supporting the economic recovery.

 

Next week, I'll be standing down from my blog-writing responsibility for a week and we'll be publishing a guest blog by Professor Russel Griggs OBE who is Lead reviewer of the banks appeals processes and Chair of the Scottish Government’s Regulatory Review Group ahead of the publication of his second annual report in June.

 

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The value of true leadership'

The Financial Times reported this week that "if the International Monetary Fund's latest forecasts are right, then meaningful growth looks set to elude Britain for another two years." So stagflation is here to stay.

 

I've been listening to Jim Collins' 2011 book 'Great by Choice' and the results of this research are fascinating. The sub-title is 'Uncertainty, chaos and luck – why some thrive despite them all' and, following his standard research approach, Jim (together with his colleague Morten Hansen) looks at truly successful businesses and compares and contrasts them with a direct competitor which they have out-performed by a factor of at least ten times over a defined period. I'm only half-way through the book but what is already apparent is that the successful examples are, to a great extent, the result of having a great or enlightened leader. He talks about three common elements: Fanatic Discipline, Empirical Creativity, and Productive Paranoia but comes back to an individual that led the business' approach and made a real difference.

 

The early part of the book is a captivating comparison of the attempts by Captain Scott and Roald Amundsen to reach the South Pole. He argues and demonstrates that they were both operating in similar environments but that the difference was their approach both before and during their expeditions. For Amundsen it was a race to victory and a safe return home while, for Captain Scott, it was a devastating and tragic defeat. Events that date back to 1911 have some strong and powerful lessons for today.

If we're in a prolonged period without growth then the approach we take to our roles and to our businesses will determine the outcome and – wherever we sit within an organisation – we can have an impact and have to choose whether it will be positive or negative. I know I'm currently looking closely at what I need to do differently in the months ahead.

 

When it comes to great leaders, there's been a huge amount written following the recent death of Margaret Thatcher. It's been interesting to listen to commentators and contemporaries, some of whom are great supporters and others vociferous detractors, all share one view. She was passionate in her beliefs, she was fiercely loyal to her country, and she has left a lasting legacy on British politics. In an era when bland sound-bytes and immediate short-term company results are too often the focus, real leaders are few and far between and we need more of them driving us back to growth.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Falling on deaf ears'

I was interested to see the ICAEW (Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales) quoted by James Hurley in the Telegraph last weekend making the same point the ICM had made in its submission to a government consultation in March this year. The consultation related to the implementation of 'Simpler Financial Reporting for Micro-Entities'. The Telegraph article is here and the changes include a reduction in the amount of information filed with Companies House and the opportunity to mix two different types of accounting – the traditional ‘accruals’ approach and so-called ‘cash accounting’.

 

The government claims that the measures will reduce red tape for small businesses making it easier for them to do business. We believe, however, that it will reduce the availability of credit and stifle the economy rather than the claimed positive alternative. Our argument focuses on four key issues. Firstly, to abridge or abbreviate accounts – or indeed any document – you first need to have the full version to work from. Filing less information does not, therefore, reduce the preparation time, indeed if anything it will increase it. Secondly, the presentation of prepayments and accrued income, and accruals and deferred income is vital to understanding the true financial position of a business and to being certain that it is solvent.

 

Thirdly, the absence of reported information will encourage suppliers to simply refuse requests for trade credit rather than go to the trouble of seeking more detailed information from the potential customer, particularly when the amounts involved are small. It is these modest transactions that accumulate into real economic activity and potential growth. Our final argument is that by categorising a business that turns over £440,000 and employs ten people in the same way as a genuine micro-business that might trade solely on a cash basis is ludicrous. What is worse is that the turnover and net assets limits have been substantially increased since the original discussion paper was published in August 2011.

 

Another example of unintended consequences resulting from a failure to listen adequately to the voices of those who live in the real world, I fear.

 

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Setting the agenda for credit management'

Last week we saw late payment and the Prompt Payment Code, hosted by the ICM for BIS, rise rapidly up the political agenda.  Business Minister Michael Fallon wrote to the Chief Executives of all FTSE100 and 250 companies that have not signed up to the Prompt Payment Code, urging them to do so and advising that he plans to publicly name those who don't.

 

Then, last Thursday, there was a debate in the House of Commons on 'Stimulating growth through better use of the Prompt Payment Code' where the impact of late payment was discussed in detail.  The ICM's press release following the debate can be found here.

 

This recent activity coupled with the implementation of the revised EU Late Payment Directive by March 2013 means that credit management, as one of the most effective ways to avoid and deal with late payment, is also firmly on the agenda.  Credit management is key to ensuring healthy cashflow and there have now been over 370,000 downloads of our Managing Cashflow Guides aimed at helping small businesses to get the basics right.

 

Let's make sure we make the most of this opportunity to demonstrate and promote the value that credit professionals bring to their businesses and ultimately to the economy as a whole.  Now is the time to stand up and be counted, be noticed, and be proud.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Re-arranging the deckchairs'

The report from Lord Heseltine released this week - No stone unturned in pursuit of growth - contains some interesting proposals. I'm writing these words within hours of publication so I won't pretend for a minute to have read and digested all 89 recommendations but I have scanned the chapter focusing on localism, and building on our strengths.

 

The report says we must 'reverse the long trend to centralism' and goes on to propose we should 'empower local places by letting them take the initiative to generate local growth, in partnership with central government', and 'we must ensure that the incentives and structures of local places are organised in such a way as to secure the greatest possible economic contribution, with each area able to play to its natural strengths.’

 

It's difficult to argue with this - local people should be more aware of the needs and opportunities in their area - and this should therefore be more effective than funding being handled, and activity controlled, from the centre. However, if the 29 current Local Enterprise Partnerships, and their predecessor Regional Development Agencies have demonstrated one thing, it is that some local organisations are better than others.

 

Lord Heseltine says ‘...growth is everyone's business. Government can set national policies and create an environment where business can flourish, but success depends on businesses and individuals working together. As we prepare for growth we must - each and every one of us - do all in our power to advance it. It is not someone else's problem.’

 

Good true words but if a local infrastructure is going to work as we all want, then it needs to deliver consistently well and effectively across all regions. If it doesn't, we're in danger of just rearranging the deck chairs under a new name.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Making business add up'

I've been catching up on reading that accumulated while I was on holiday and had a look at the SME Finance Monitor over last weekend; the full document can be found here: http://www.sme-finance-monitor.co.uk

 

A few interesting statistics struck me: 43% SMEs are using external finance, compared with 51% a year ago; 34% of loan and 21% of overdraft applications were declined; banks offered alternative funding or pointed to alternative sources of finance in just 9% (loans) and 13% (overdrafts) of cases; 70% of those declined felt the advice they received from the bank was poor and 25% were not given reasons for the decline decision. Almost more alarmingly, only 8% (loans) and 14% (overdrafts) of declined applicants were aware of the appeals process even though it's been available for well over a year now, and just 47% were aware of any of the Government's lending initiatives, of which the National Loan Guarantee Scheme is but one example.

 

So we still haven't fixed the problem that banks (and the Government) aren't communicating adequately with the SME community, and the message persists, particularly from the media and some business organisations, that banks remain reluctant to lend. But we do also need a sense of balance.

 

I've just started listening to Jonathan Moules' book 'The Rebel Entrepreneur'. Jonathan has been Enterprise Correspondent at the Financial Times for several years and he makes the point in an early chapter that, although the banks may seem reluctant to lend, there is a balancing argument that says the current economic situation is in part due to banks lending when they shouldn't have done so, and on terms that were unsustainable. He argues that many businesses do not merit being lent to, and gives examples of very successful businesses that achieved their growth by managing in the early days on a shoestring and refusing to incur debt that could sooner or later become a millstone. If the banks don't impose sensible lending policies, we'll be in danger of repeating the cycle all over again.

 

I'm an avid follower of Dragons' Den and it's hard not to be frustrated by entrepreneurs who clearly have a brilliant business idea but cannot remember, or worse do not know, the salient financials on which their request for funding is based. If someone cannot say how much the business turned over or made/lost in the recent past, then why would anyone have the confidence to risk their own capital? Talking to bankers I hear many examples of businesses who seek funding based on a business case that is at best unrealistic and, at worst, simply doesn't add up (literally).

 

Just as businesses have to help themselves by applying basic credit management principles, so they need to think through their plans and ensure they put together a business case that is realistic and believable before they ask for funding. The more information they provide, and the better it is, the greater their chance of success. 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Reading between the lines?'

Last week Vince Cable announced that the Government was tabling the Statutory Instrument to implement the planned changes to accounting thresholds.  The accompanying BIS press release heralded the fact that allowing 36,000 more companies to choose not to have an audit "will help save UK companies millions every year and free them up to expand and grow their business, which ultimately benefits the entire British economy".

 

How frustrating it is to see the Government fail to grasp a fundamental principle of trade credit and business. Suppliers make credit decisions based on the information available to them; the more information, and the more reliable it is, the better will be the quality of the decision.  It follows that, where the information supports it, credit will be more readily available to the business requiring the goods or service.  Most likely, 36,000 companies will now follow the implicit steer from Government and leave potential suppliers struggling to justify the granting of credit.  Will that aid economic growth? I think not!

 

We should remind ourselves what audits do.  Formally, they ensure the accounts represent a true and fair view of the company's financial situation giving suppliers confidence in the status of the business they're being asked to support through the provision of goods or services on credit.  But they do much more besides.  Very often, they highlight errors in the business's accounting system, records or processes, they identify any gaps or omissions that could be attributable to inefficiency or, worse, fraud, and they provide an independent and objective view of the business.  A good auditor can be very useful to a business; I know the ICM's auditor takes a real interest in its business and our discussions go far beyond the accounts and the numbers.

 

Interestingly, only this week, I saw a draft article for a European magazine by a university academic referring to the positive impact of the changes in 2006 that obliged German companies, especially small and medium-sized ones, to disclose financial statements and the resulting increased transparency!

 

I understand the thinking behind the changes and I have no problem for micro-businesses with very low turnover where accounting is cash-based and simple, but we're talking here about businesses with turnover up to £6.5m and 50 employees.  When an error eventually comes to light and the company fails because it's too late to do anything about it, there will be impacts on the business, its suppliers, its employees and the economy.  The suggestion that something that can be so invaluable is an unnecessary regulatory burden is misguided, naive, and unhelpful.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A journey of discovery'

In my blog last week I mentioned that I'd seen a really good example of the Government working with the wider business community to deliver growth through tangible and practical support.  I said that sometimes Government has to create an environment in which something can be created and delivered without its direct and ongoing involvement.

I was referring specifically to the launch of the Start-up Loans Company, which many of you will by now have seen in the press.  You may also have learned from our own ICM announcement that I've been invited to join the Start-up Loans Company board.

The Start-up Loans Company is different from any previous Government scheme I have ever seen.  It is not a case of ministers throwing money at a problem just to say that they are doing something – money that is often squandered. This scheme is much more focused, and has a specific purpose.

The Start-up Loans Company is a limited company with an independent board chaired by respected entrepreneur James Caan.  While the funds come from the Government purse, our role as a board is to be responsible for identifying appropriate delivery partners, and for setting the ground rules that they will have to follow. Government is stepping back, letting the board lead the initiative, and giving us the autonomy to be able to drive the scheme forward.

Loans will be at a competitive interest rate, and are likely to average £2,500 (though not a maximum as has mistakenly been reported elsewhere).  They will be repaid over a period of up to five years.  Crucially, the initiative – as Lord Young stressed as the launch event – is not just about the cash; it is also about the support the young entrepreneurs (aged between 18 – 24) will receive from a network of mentors across the country, to help turn their dreams into reality.

The board is also comprised of experts chosen to help the scheme succeed.  Each board member has a particular area of responsibility and will be expected to deliver real tangible results.  It is especially gratifying to see the importance of cashflow and credit management being recognised and getting their rightful place. My brief is to ensure we have the right mechanism, process, procedure and drawdown facilities in place to enable the smooth running, and monitoring, of the issuing and recovery of loans.  The sort of things that credit professionals do every day, but not what you'd necessarily and ordinarily expect to see included in a government initiative.

I can't wait to get started, and I'm going to enjoy working alongside Lord Young, James Caan, Bev James, Julie Meyer, Duncan Cheatle and the other directors.  I believe they are going to teach me more than a thing or two along the way and I know I'm going to get as much out of this journey as I put in.  Seeing youngsters set up their own businesses and take steps towards their dreams is a massive opportunity and I feel privileged to be part of it.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Putting the lifeblood back into business'

The highly regarded Ernst & Young Item Club came out at the weekend with a forecast growth for the year of a dismal 0.4%. Although Item Club uses the same economic models as the Treasury, its forecast was much worse than the Treasury's a few weeks ago. Speaking on Radio 4 earlier in the week, its commentator attributed this largely to timing and the dynamic nature of economic factors. The Club says Britain's economic growth will remain anaemic because companies are hoarding their cash, and it will stay on the "critical list" until companies start spending again.

I talk to many businesses of all shapes and sizes and the vast majority tell me that they are struggling to find customers who are willing to spend or make significant investments. This is a feeling particularly prevalent among the SME community whose fundamental priority seems to be one of survival rather than planning for growth or expansion. We're all waiting for real signs of recovery before we can start to feel confident, and until confidence returns we won't want to spend or invest. Until we do, however, "Britain's economic growth will remain anaemic because companies are hording their cash, and it will stay on the "critical list"......" (see above). It seems like the classic vicious circle to me!

There is one thing that companies could do though that would generate cash-flow for the whole business community and would definitely aid economic recovery. Pay their bills on time! Some do, and there are examples of really good practice, but many - big and small - don't, and because of that their suppliers struggle for healthy cash-flow and in some cases fail to survive. The Prompt Payment Code hosted by the ICM for BIS was launched to help change the culture to one where paying on time and to the agreed payment terms was the norm rather than the exception. Well in excess of a thousand organisations have signed up to the Code but many more could do so.

Paying on time has many advantages: it releases money tied up in unpaid debtors; it allows business owners to focus on selling and providing a better service rather than chasing payment from tardy customers; and ultimately it helps more businesses to survive and prosper. The Prompt Payment Code can be found at http://www.promptpaymentcode.org.uk/.

Guest Blog by Josef Busuttil, Director General of Malta Association of Credit Management - 'A Credit Management View from Malta'

The small market economy of Malta has been strong enough to resist and manage the economic and financial turmoil that hit the World, in particular, Europe. Thanks to the Maltese regulators, the financial services sector has remained significantly strong and the banks are still enjoying growth and increase in their profits. 2011 was also a record year for tourism, a sector on which the Maltese economy greatly depends.

This does not mean that all is rosy and that the sun shines 365 days-a-year over this rock. It also rains in Malta! Malta does not live in a vacuum. It forms part of the European Union and the Euro-zone, and it exports its products and services worldwide like any other developed country. Hence, what happens offshore affect the Maltese economy to a certain or greater extent!

One of the factors that has hit the Maltese business community is surely the rationed credit facilities from the foreign principals/suppliers. However, from a local credit perspective, Malta has made stark improvement during the recent past. Since MACM - Malta Association of Credit Management - was established in 2001, it has worked and lobbied for a better credit environment and Maltese businesses have witnessed improvement in a number of pertinent credit areas. This includes the number of dishonoured cheques that has gone down remarkably, the credit-related legal framework which is now in place, the judicial system which is more efficient, and business organisations are today adopting more the credit management practices, tools and systems provided by MACM in order to protect their cash flow and secure their long-term profit.

Nevertheless, MACM is aware that late payment is still a major concern for the Maltese businesses. It believes that authorities should do more to enforce legislation that would help creditors in their cash flow management. MACM suggests that the enforcement of court judgments should not only be efficient but also effective. Besides, MACM still notes that some local firms may not be deploying the proper credit management practices when granting and managing credit. These are some of the challenges that MACM is currently addressing.

In fact, MACM advocates that in today's business, a credit practitioner should do more than crunching numbers. The role of the credit practitioner should focus on how to gain and sustain competitive advantage in the market, whilst protecting cash flow and securing long-term profit. This requires up-to-date credit information and skilled staff supported by their top management team and assisted by the appropriate tools and systems in their day-to-day duties.

To support its members, MACM provides credit information which is updated on a daily basis. This information assists Maltese businesses to identify the most significant 'warning signs', which include:

*history of dishonoured cheques and overdue accounts;

* history of court judgements and executive warrants;

* history of court orders and court notices;

* customer changing banker/auditor;

* companies' information and accounts;

* changes in payment pattern;

* lack of filing of accounts as required by the Registrar of Companies (in case of companies);

*other databases that help businesses to identify their prospective customers.

MACM has also invested to provide education to the people working in the field of credit management. Thanks to the ICM Accreditation, Maltese credit practitioners have the opportunity to read the ICM Diploma in Credit Management and to sit for the relative examinations in Malta.

Credit Management is a peoples' function and having skilled and educated credit practitioners would result in better cash flow management, enhanced long-term customer relationship and improved business perception in the market, which are all required to gain and sustain competitive advantage and market share - which is the name of the game in such a changing global environment.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Leading by example'

There's been much talk in recent months about mentoring as a tool to increase the survival and growth rate for businesses, and I make no apology if this week's blog reads a bit like a commercial!

In July 2011, the mentorsme web portal http://www.mentorsme.co.uk/ was launched as an online gateway to mentoring services for SMEs. It was one of the 17 initiatives coming out of the British Bankers' Association's Business Finance Taskforce, and this was followed in November 2011 by an announcement by BIS that new grant funding of £1.2m was being made available to recruit and train 10,000 volunteer business mentors through the Get Mentoring project run by the Small Firms Enterprise Development Initiative (SFEDI).

Over 3,000 volunteers have already signed up for training and, as the BIS funding is only available until the end of March, the ICM was asked last week to promote SFEDI's new online training which is now available at http://www.getmentoring.org/. This online platform will make it easier for business people to get involved and benefit from training that will help them develop the skills to become effective business mentors.

In the recent press release, Mark Prisk said: "Get mentoring is about businesses helping each other to succeed." The release went on to say that mentoring has been shown to increase the survival and growth rate for businesses, and can be a great way of boosting capability and capacity within a sector or supply chain. It can aid the professional development of both parties, enhancing leadership and management skills and improving soft skills (eg business confidence and aspiration) and business performance (eg turnover and profit). Mentors must be willing to offer at least one hour per month free to their mentee(s).

As credit professionals, many of us deal regularly with SMEs, and getting involved in this way could enhance our outlook and understanding of business generally, and especially the challenges faced by smaller businesses.

If you think you might have the necessary skills and experience to become a mentor, why not sign up today at http://www.getmentoring.org/ and start making a difference. I have.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Supporting the Business in You'

A campaign was launched by David Cameron in Leeds on Monday. 'Business in You' is a partnership between private enterprise and Government to highlight support for start-ups and growing businesses and encourage entrepreneurial spirit in 2012. It will run throughout the year and I'm delighted to say the ICM is actively engaged as one of the initial supporting organisations.

The campaign aims to highlight the fact that many people are sitting on an idea that could become a business, and many businesses have the potential to grow whether that's by launching new products, entering new markets, exporting for the first time or more widely, or by accepting the challenge and going for growth despite the negative malaise that surrounds us. The campaign website can be viewed at: http://businessinyou.bis.gov.uk/

I was at a meeting at BIS with many other of the supporting organisations on Tuesday and there are some really inspiring case studies being shared, and some innovative support solutions being offered by organisations as diverse as the Forum of Private Business, CBI, Institute of Directors, British Bankers' Association, ACCA, ICAEW, Intuit, Microsoft, Paypal, and Mitie to name but a few. Interestingly this is less about a government campaign with private sector support, and more about a collaboration that brings together the best from both the public and private sectors. And encouragingly, this isn't a government short-term soundbite-style gimmick but a long-term activity lasting for the whole year with links into many events and propositions. So how does the Institute of Credit management fit into this?

One of the challenges for all businesses, and particularly for start-ups and growing organisations, is making sure they have enough cash to sustain the business and its requirements. Managing cash-flow is vital, and the over 275,000 downloads of the ICM's Managing Cashflow Guides are testament to how relevant the subject is, and what an appetite there is to gain the necessary skills to manage it better. I hope the 'Business in You' campaign succeeds in encouraging more entrepreneurs to create a start-up, and more businesses to successfully expand but if it also helps businesses to manage their finances better and therefore survive longer, then it will have delivered something really worthwhile. I am proud that the ICM is among its supporters.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Never underestimate the value of good credit management'

The Bank of England published its Credit Conditions Survey for quarter 4 of 2011 last week. In summary, it said that although lenders expected a small increase in overall credit availability in the coming three months, it will be impacted negatively by factors such as the economic outlook and tighter wholesale funding conditions. Furthermore, a key determinant of credit availability will be developments in the euro area and their impact on banks' funding conditions. It noted that demand was down across all areas but most significantly from small businesses where it fell sharply. I guess a succinct way of distilling the 17-page report down to a few words would be: a stagnant economy where lack of confidence is stifling demand to spend or invest, and where external factors could have a major effect!

I'm often reminded by our members - and I in turn remind government in meetings - that trade creditors lend more to businesses than the banks and - just as bank lending decisions impact on the ability of the economy to grow - so do the credit decisions of credit professionals. When they decline or accept an order or contract, they impact on the whole trade cycle for themselves, their customer, their customer's customer and so on either negatively or positively. That in turn impacts on the economy and its capacity to grow. In isolation of course, an individual transaction is probably not material, but cumulatively the impact is immense.

In my blog last week, I talked about showing and being proud of our professionalism - that professionalism is manifested in the decisions we reach throughout all credit management activity. Getting them right, whether we're dealing with multi-national corporations or individual consumers, is vitally important and we shouldn't underestimate the impact we have, not only on our own organisations but on the wider economic well-being.

Please click here to complete the ICM UK Credit Managers' Index - it only takes 2 minutes.

If you haven't already signed up to participate in the ICM UK Credit Managers' Index, please join the panel that commits to complete it quarterly and contribute to this influential and important industry benchmark. The results are widely publicised in the trade and financial press, and on the ICM website, and all participants will automatically receive access to the results and summary prior to general release.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A positive route to growth'

So the latest Project Merlin figures have been released and they show that, in the third quarter, new lending to business was £57.4bn, of which £18.8bn was to SME's. Let's remember that the full-year targets are £190bn and £76bn respectively with £157.7bn and £56.1bn being achieved so far. Simple arithmetic tells me, assuming nothing much changes, that the total lending target will be achieved and the SME target will probably fall a trifle short. Not surprisingly, the data has generated the usual and expected clamour for banks to be forced to lend more to small businesses.

Regular readers will not want me to reiterate my view with regards the fallacy of 'forcing' banks to lend, and they will have seen my blog last week talking about some basic errors made by start-up businesses. I believe my observations then support my contention that lending decisions should be based on rational - rather than political or emotional - criteria.

I was privileged to be a contributor to the BIS/UKTI-organised UK Growth and Finance Fitness event in London last Thursday, and the subject of SME growth and finance was a recurring theme in Lord Green and David Cameron's opening speeches. Vince Cable also took up the theme in his address, as did Doug Richard, and early Dragons Den guru and an angel investor, who expressed his views clearly and articulately.

The reality of course is that not all SMEs want or need to borrow; indeed a recent SME Finance Monitor report showed that 47 percent never use external funding ('never' defined as neither now nor in the past five years). What we need, therefore, is an environment in which SMEs want - and feel confident - to grow, and one way to achieve that would be through a growth in exporting.

Two statistics in David Cameron's speech struck me in particular: firstly, only one in five SMEs export but if that figure was increased to one in four, Britain's trade deficit would be wiped out; secondly, Britain exports more to Ireland than to Brazil, Russia, India and China combined; the BRIC countries therefore represent a huge potential market.

So why don't more SMEs export, and, perhaps connected, why don't more SMEs want to obtain external funding? I've said in a number of forums with government and others that the key to SME growth is less about obtaining funding, and more about building confidence. Increased confidence would deliver more willingness to introduce new products and services, more willingness to enter new markets either at home or overseas, and more willingness to take on additional staff.

I've also expressed my view that many SMEs don't consider exporting because they see it as a 'dark art' and are afraid of the unknown. I'm delighted ECGD announced at the event that it is changing its name from 'Export Credits Guarantee Department' to 'UK Export Finance' and is going to work much more closely with UKTI. I believe that even such a cosmetic change will make SME's less apprehensive or uncertain as regards what the former ECGD does - and the help it can provide.

A recurring theme also came from the panel of small businesses who are successfully exporting. They started exporting because they were in a desperate situation and it was their last hope of keeping the business alive...and it worked. What we need is more businesses embracing exporting as a positive route to growth rather than a last resort and act of desperation.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Sound bites aren't enough'

Amid the hype around Project Merlin and the banks last week, the announcement from BIS of four new schemes http://bit.ly/gglodF specifically to help exporters seems to have got somewhat lost in the noise.

On the face of it, all four of the schemes have merit. They are designed, in simple terms, to enable businesses greater access to trade finance and insurance against credit risk where such help may not be available from the private sector.

As always with such initiatives, the devil is in the detail which I fear the headline announcement masks. It seems the circumstances in which the schemes will be available are limited, and the benefits will - in turn - also be restricted to a few rather than the many. Previous forays by government to support exporters have not been spectacularly successful; they have tended to be overcomplicated, and as a result, under-subscribed.

Export growth is crucial in the recovery we so desperately need, and schemes like these need to be visible, understood, and used; they need to be simple and easy to apply for; and they need to be flexible so their impact is maximised. The intention is laudable, and I don't want to write these off just yet. But there is a tendency for government to fail in its follow-through, and this time they need to listen and respond positively and quickly to feedback so the objectives of driving exports and aiding economic recovery in the UK can be met.

Businesses don't grow through sound bites. Behind the rhetoric, there need to be real and tangible measures of support.