Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Why I am not Prime Minister'

This is going to be a shorter blog than I often write and it's more of a question based on my confusion than an exposition of my views! The ministerial reshuffle announced this week includes a move that leaves me perplexed, as did an earlier decision.

In September 2012, Michael Fallon was appointed Business and Enterprise Minister replacing Mark Prisk who'd held the role for a while before that, and was moving to a housing portfolio. So far so good, and Michael Fallon made a good early impression and has been instrumental in successfully driving the prompt payment debate. Then, inexplicably to me, in March 2013 the role of Minister of State for Energy was added to his portfolio meaning he was a minister in two departments: BIS (Department for Business Innovation & Skills) and DECC (Department for Energy & Climate Change). I couldn't work out then why a minister would be given a role across two separate departments given the workload and demands of one but that's probably why I'm not Prime Minister!

In this week's reshuffle, Michael Fallon has been made Industry & Energy Minister, I presume straddling the same two departments (BIS and DECC), and Matt Hancock has been appointed Minister for Skills & Enterprise working in BIS and the Department for Education. I understand such areas as late payment will be moving to Matt Hancock's remit. I've enjoyed working with Michael Fallon and his team. I think he's been effective, and I'm sure Matt Hancock will be similarly so but my question is this: why is attention to such an issue as late payment being potentially diluted through its responsibility being added to such a diverse portfolio? An issue which affects all businesses, particularly small ones, and impacts massively on the wider economy surely deserves better.

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Setting the agenda for credit management'

Last week we saw late payment and the Prompt Payment Code, hosted by the ICM for BIS, rise rapidly up the political agenda.  Business Minister Michael Fallon wrote to the Chief Executives of all FTSE100 and 250 companies that have not signed up to the Prompt Payment Code, urging them to do so and advising that he plans to publicly name those who don't.

 

Then, last Thursday, there was a debate in the House of Commons on 'Stimulating growth through better use of the Prompt Payment Code' where the impact of late payment was discussed in detail.  The ICM's press release following the debate can be found here.

 

This recent activity coupled with the implementation of the revised EU Late Payment Directive by March 2013 means that credit management, as one of the most effective ways to avoid and deal with late payment, is also firmly on the agenda.  Credit management is key to ensuring healthy cashflow and there have now been over 370,000 downloads of our Managing Cashflow Guides aimed at helping small businesses to get the basics right.

 

Let's make sure we make the most of this opportunity to demonstrate and promote the value that credit professionals bring to their businesses and ultimately to the economy as a whole.  Now is the time to stand up and be counted, be noticed, and be proud.

Philip King, CEO of Institute of Credit Management (ICM) - 'Judge or Jury'

I had the privilege of sitting on the judging panel last week for the SME category of the National Business Awards. It was the first time I've been a judge where the nominees have to present a 'pitch' and it was a fascinating experience. I've always wondered what it felt like to be a dragon in the den, and I guess this is the closest I'll ever get to finding out!

There were 12 entries and we spent a long day listening to a series of presentations from a range of very diverse businesses. It was inspirational hearing from people who have turned an idea into a business that is thriving and, in some cases, hugely successful in a very short space of time.

The common theme, certainly among the front runners, was unbridled energy and enthusiasm and a passion for a business that entrepreneurs saw as 'their baby'. If those qualities could be replicated and reproduced across business, it's hard to believe we'd still be struggling to see the recovery for which we all yearn. So often, the idea was simple and certainly not rocket science. As a judge, I was left thinking why somebody else hadn't thought of it before and wishing I had a more creative mind that could spot what seemed like obvious opportunities once somebody else has pointed them out!

The Start-Up Loans Company in which I'm involved has now started lending and, at the Board Meeting this week, we were hearing examples of young people who are determined to turn an idea into a successful business and - judging by their determination - will do so.

On the political front, we've heard Vince Cable's announcement about the new Government-funded bank to support SMEs. The devil, as always, will be in the detail but I certainly welcome the plan to bring together in one place Government finance support for small and mid-sized businesses. As I've said here recently, the multiplicity and complexity of schemes often results in them almost working against each other so if the new bank helps to simplify and de-clutter the landscape, it can only be a good thing.

It was good to meet Michael Fallon, the new Business Minister, this week and I'm at the Labour and Conservative conferences over the next two weeks. It will be interesting to hear what the parties have to say at this mid-way point of the current Government.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Shuffling the pack'

 

I'm always fascinated by arguments about correct usage of words and I was amused by a debate on the Radio 4 Today programme on Tuesday about whether, since the bulk movement of Ministerial appointments was the first by David Cameron, it should actually be called a shuffle rather than a reshuffle. A complete irrelevance but nevertheless quite fun!

 

More interesting has been the debate about the real reasons for the changes and whether they are to achieve policy shifts, to recognise good or poor performance, to change the political spin brought to specific areas of government activity, or simply to change the shape or style of the ministerial team. There are many and diverse views about this, and I suspect the reality is that it is a combination of all four and some more besides.

 

Speaking personally, I'm sorry to see Mark Prisk move from his role as Minister of State for Business and Enterprise. Although I haven't always agreed with him, he is tuned into business and seems to understand well the challenges they face. It will be interesting to see whether Michael Fallon maintains the momentum started by Mark but the inactivity caused by ministerial transition is always frustrating even though it's nothing new and expected.

 

Whatever the motivations for the changes, many issues remain and require resolution, one of which is the amount of debt owed to central government estimated to cost the public purse £7-8billion per year. Earlier this year, the interim report 'Tackling Debt owed to Government' was issued by the Cabinet Office's Fraud, Error and Debt Taskforce and since then the Institute has continued its engagement with the task force and the Debt Expert Panel in identifying how professionalism in debt management across government can be enhanced and improved. As part of that work, we are pleased to be working in association with Dods who are delivering a conference in London on 15 October considering the issues raised by the report, reviewing the activity underway, and looking to the future. If you're involved in working in, or with, the public sector in any way and want to attend, please register here, and I'm pleased to say ICM members can gain a £200 discount from the standard conference fee.