Weekly blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Sharing the golden nuggets!'

I spent a day this week at the ICM's Quality in Credit Management Best Practice Conference in London. The event was for organisations that have achieved, are on the journey towards achieving, or aspire to achieve the Quality in Credit Management accreditation award. What a great day.

 

I'm not going to bang on about the benefits of the Quality in Credit Management Award accreditation scheme (though clearly I could) but rather I'm keen to talk about the benefits of sharing best practice. When you get a group of people in a room who are at the top of their game - either personally or from an organisational perspective - it's amazing what comes out.

 

At the conference, we heard a series of speakers sharing their experiences and giving examples of best practice. Of course, what works for one organisation might not work for another, but hearing and filtering ideas is a great opportunity to improve, and helps meet one of the objectives of QICM, that of facilitating continuous improvement for people and organisations.

 

Some of the ideas were incredibly simple and others far more sophisticated. For example, we heard about the huge impact of introducing very simple and cheap 'music on hold' which made a great positive impression on both customers and the internal organisation.

 

More than one presenter talked about their plans to educate customers to improve their own credit management processes and procedures on the basis that, if they were more effective at collecting cash, they'd be better able to settle invoices promptly. A good example of sharing best practice with the wider business community and particularly with SMEs and micro-businesses who may lack relevant experience and expertise.

 

We saw some impressive dashboards and an explanation of how they can be used to best effect. Letting commercial people understand the value of overdue debt in terms of a number of new salesmen or replacement delivery vehicles, for example, is not a new idea but is very powerful.

 

Afternoon presentations addressed how to energise and motivate teams through periods of change and how to make step changes in performance. Some innovative and invigorating ideas on how to create a culture that is focused, cohesive and driven. The case studies came from large organisations but contained concepts that could be adopted in a variety of environments.

 

What's even more interesting about events like this is that people can contribute more than they realise. Participants turn up expecting to learn from the wisdom and experience of the presenters without realising how good they are themselves, and what nuggets they also have to share. Whether we call it networking or by some other grand name, sharing what we know, what we do, and what we've learnt is one of the most powerful business tools, and we should do more of it.

Guest blog by Sue Chapple, Head of Revenue Management of EDF Energy Plc - 'No pain no gain?'

For three weeks in July every year, our household becomes totally and utterly obsessed with the Tour de France.  This is a relatively new phenomenon, which has crept up on us over the last five years – but still now, our total immersion with the event, takes even us by surprise.  The ‘phone goes unanswered, ironing builds to a veritable monster, the weeds gang up on us and the dog has to remind us he wants to be fed and walked!

 

So as the 2013 edition draws to a spectacular close and we are left feeling bereft, I wonder what, if anything, I can draw from the experience.

 

I suppose the overriding observation, every year, is the total and unswerving dedication to the cause.  The absolute commitment from every single rider, to every kilometre of the race, regardless of pain, weather, or gradient is remarkable.  Does this type of dedication exist at all, outside of the sporting arena?

 

Is it possible to harness just a tiny bit of this focus and desire and capture it for our own worlds? Or are the participants, by definition, simply a special breed that cannot be ‘recreated’ in any other environment?  Could we look at the Sky Team approach to ‘process improvement’ which, in the words of the great (Sir) Dave Brailsford, is all about marginal gain: if you work, methodically, to remove variances over which you have control and which have a negative impact, and aim to do 100 things one percent better – the impact in any walk of life will at the very least be noticeable and at best, incredible.

 

So far so good, now I wonder how my team will feel about the lycra suits………

 

Next week Philip King’s guest blogger will be Sue Kettle, Director of Membership & Support Services for the ICM.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A chorus of disapproval'

I was at the ICAEW Insolvency & Restructuring Group Annual Conference in London earlier this week and took part in a panel looking at 'Breaking down barriers between participants in the insolvency process'. It was a good debate, and the whole conference had some excellent speakers and content, not least a presentation by Justin Urquhart Stewart on the global economy that was both insightful and highly entertaining. The reason for writing about the conference here, though, is that I had an issue with three views expressed by different presenters, with which I personally disagreed.

The first view was that the low rate of corporate insolvencies is likely to continue and unlikely to rise even when the economy starts to recover. I've had a long-held belief that insolvencies will spike when things get better and that remains my view. The demand for cash in struggling businesses will inevitably put them under more pressure and a greater likelihood of failure, and it will be accompanied by an environment in which the banks and other creditors will take a less tolerant view of businesses in distress. We were told that this recession is likely to be different from previous ones and the cyclical rise is less likely to happen. I disagree.

The second, from a politician, was that one of the prime reasons for the zombie companies about which we read (and I've written) so much is the failure of the banks to lend. I questioned the linkage he'd suggested and he clarified his point which was that the original failure to lend had created the shortage of working capital that had created the 'zombie state'. I acknowledge there will be some cases where having more working capital would have made the business stronger and allowed it to perhaps expand and thrive but, more generally, the problem must be that the underlying business model is flawed such that either turnover or profitability is inadequate to sustain the operation. Yes, we want the banks to lend more (to businesses that will be able to repay) but not if it means they will become a bigger write-off in due course.

The third was from an eminent senior banker who said he had yet to see a 'zombie company'. Maybe his definition is different to mine but I see, and hear about, plenty of businesses that are living from day to day covering the interest element of their debt with difficulty and knowing they are in no position to reduce the capital borrowing. And that goes for individuals too who are borrowing from one source to cover the minimum repayment on another.

I guess the value of conferences like this is that we learn, we hear different views, and we get the chance to challenge - or reinforce - our own thinking. I'm often wrong, indeed it's one of my well-known strengths, but I'm not sure I am on these issues.
 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Re-arranging the deckchairs'

The report from Lord Heseltine released this week - No stone unturned in pursuit of growth - contains some interesting proposals. I'm writing these words within hours of publication so I won't pretend for a minute to have read and digested all 89 recommendations but I have scanned the chapter focusing on localism, and building on our strengths.

 

The report says we must 'reverse the long trend to centralism' and goes on to propose we should 'empower local places by letting them take the initiative to generate local growth, in partnership with central government', and 'we must ensure that the incentives and structures of local places are organised in such a way as to secure the greatest possible economic contribution, with each area able to play to its natural strengths.’

 

It's difficult to argue with this - local people should be more aware of the needs and opportunities in their area - and this should therefore be more effective than funding being handled, and activity controlled, from the centre. However, if the 29 current Local Enterprise Partnerships, and their predecessor Regional Development Agencies have demonstrated one thing, it is that some local organisations are better than others.

 

Lord Heseltine says ‘...growth is everyone's business. Government can set national policies and create an environment where business can flourish, but success depends on businesses and individuals working together. As we prepare for growth we must - each and every one of us - do all in our power to advance it. It is not someone else's problem.’

 

Good true words but if a local infrastructure is going to work as we all want, then it needs to deliver consistently well and effectively across all regions. If it doesn't, we're in danger of just rearranging the deck chairs under a new name.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A journey of discovery'

In my blog last week I mentioned that I'd seen a really good example of the Government working with the wider business community to deliver growth through tangible and practical support.  I said that sometimes Government has to create an environment in which something can be created and delivered without its direct and ongoing involvement.

I was referring specifically to the launch of the Start-up Loans Company, which many of you will by now have seen in the press.  You may also have learned from our own ICM announcement that I've been invited to join the Start-up Loans Company board.

The Start-up Loans Company is different from any previous Government scheme I have ever seen.  It is not a case of ministers throwing money at a problem just to say that they are doing something – money that is often squandered. This scheme is much more focused, and has a specific purpose.

The Start-up Loans Company is a limited company with an independent board chaired by respected entrepreneur James Caan.  While the funds come from the Government purse, our role as a board is to be responsible for identifying appropriate delivery partners, and for setting the ground rules that they will have to follow. Government is stepping back, letting the board lead the initiative, and giving us the autonomy to be able to drive the scheme forward.

Loans will be at a competitive interest rate, and are likely to average £2,500 (though not a maximum as has mistakenly been reported elsewhere).  They will be repaid over a period of up to five years.  Crucially, the initiative – as Lord Young stressed as the launch event – is not just about the cash; it is also about the support the young entrepreneurs (aged between 18 – 24) will receive from a network of mentors across the country, to help turn their dreams into reality.

The board is also comprised of experts chosen to help the scheme succeed.  Each board member has a particular area of responsibility and will be expected to deliver real tangible results.  It is especially gratifying to see the importance of cashflow and credit management being recognised and getting their rightful place. My brief is to ensure we have the right mechanism, process, procedure and drawdown facilities in place to enable the smooth running, and monitoring, of the issuing and recovery of loans.  The sort of things that credit professionals do every day, but not what you'd necessarily and ordinarily expect to see included in a government initiative.

I can't wait to get started, and I'm going to enjoy working alongside Lord Young, James Caan, Bev James, Julie Meyer, Duncan Cheatle and the other directors.  I believe they are going to teach me more than a thing or two along the way and I know I'm going to get as much out of this journey as I put in.  Seeing youngsters set up their own businesses and take steps towards their dreams is a massive opportunity and I feel privileged to be part of it.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Substance over form'

Am I alone in getting increasingly frustrated by politics taking precedence over substance? I've been listening in recent days to the spat between Adrian Beecroft and Vince Cable about the former's report on employment law, with Chuka Umunna's contribution adding plenty of fuel to the fire.  My frustration is that there has been very little talk about the detail of the report with most of the debate focused on whether or not Vince Cable should be called a socialist, and whether Adrian Beecroft's background (he has a career in private equity and is a substantial donor to the conservative party) makes him even the right person to write the report.

All very interesting and media worthy but what I'm more interested in is the content of the report, the recommendations it makes, and how they might – or might not – benefit the economy.  Sadly, the real detail and its potential impacts is conspicuous by its absence from most reporting.  I've downloaded the draft of 12 October 2011 and the published version of 24 October 2011 to my Kindle and will have a read through over the next couple of days.  I'll be able to draw my own conclusions then and filter out the noise of the politics and rhetoric.

On a separate note, I've had some really interesting meetings this week and will be able to share more details in my blog next week.  In essence, I've seen a really good example of the Government working with the wider business community to deliver growth through tangible and practical support.  Sometimes Government has to create an environment in which something can be created and delivered without its direct and ongoing involvement.  I believe I'm seeing an excellent example of that, but more next time…

Guest Blog by Josef Busuttil, Director General of Malta Association of Credit Management - 'A Credit Management View from Malta'

The small market economy of Malta has been strong enough to resist and manage the economic and financial turmoil that hit the World, in particular, Europe. Thanks to the Maltese regulators, the financial services sector has remained significantly strong and the banks are still enjoying growth and increase in their profits. 2011 was also a record year for tourism, a sector on which the Maltese economy greatly depends.

This does not mean that all is rosy and that the sun shines 365 days-a-year over this rock. It also rains in Malta! Malta does not live in a vacuum. It forms part of the European Union and the Euro-zone, and it exports its products and services worldwide like any other developed country. Hence, what happens offshore affect the Maltese economy to a certain or greater extent!

One of the factors that has hit the Maltese business community is surely the rationed credit facilities from the foreign principals/suppliers. However, from a local credit perspective, Malta has made stark improvement during the recent past. Since MACM - Malta Association of Credit Management - was established in 2001, it has worked and lobbied for a better credit environment and Maltese businesses have witnessed improvement in a number of pertinent credit areas. This includes the number of dishonoured cheques that has gone down remarkably, the credit-related legal framework which is now in place, the judicial system which is more efficient, and business organisations are today adopting more the credit management practices, tools and systems provided by MACM in order to protect their cash flow and secure their long-term profit.

Nevertheless, MACM is aware that late payment is still a major concern for the Maltese businesses. It believes that authorities should do more to enforce legislation that would help creditors in their cash flow management. MACM suggests that the enforcement of court judgments should not only be efficient but also effective. Besides, MACM still notes that some local firms may not be deploying the proper credit management practices when granting and managing credit. These are some of the challenges that MACM is currently addressing.

In fact, MACM advocates that in today's business, a credit practitioner should do more than crunching numbers. The role of the credit practitioner should focus on how to gain and sustain competitive advantage in the market, whilst protecting cash flow and securing long-term profit. This requires up-to-date credit information and skilled staff supported by their top management team and assisted by the appropriate tools and systems in their day-to-day duties.

To support its members, MACM provides credit information which is updated on a daily basis. This information assists Maltese businesses to identify the most significant 'warning signs', which include:

*history of dishonoured cheques and overdue accounts;

* history of court judgements and executive warrants;

* history of court orders and court notices;

* customer changing banker/auditor;

* companies' information and accounts;

* changes in payment pattern;

* lack of filing of accounts as required by the Registrar of Companies (in case of companies);

*other databases that help businesses to identify their prospective customers.

MACM has also invested to provide education to the people working in the field of credit management. Thanks to the ICM Accreditation, Maltese credit practitioners have the opportunity to read the ICM Diploma in Credit Management and to sit for the relative examinations in Malta.

Credit Management is a peoples' function and having skilled and educated credit practitioners would result in better cash flow management, enhanced long-term customer relationship and improved business perception in the market, which are all required to gain and sustain competitive advantage and market share - which is the name of the game in such a changing global environment.