I was interested to see the ICAEW (Institute of
Chartered Accountants in England & Wales) quoted by James Hurley in the
Telegraph last weekend making the same point the ICM had made in its submission
to a government consultation in March this year. The consultation related to
the implementation of 'Simpler Financial Reporting for Micro-Entities'. The
Telegraph article is here and the changes include a reduction in the
amount of information filed with Companies House and the opportunity to mix two
different types of accounting – the traditional ‘accruals’ approach and
so-called ‘cash accounting’.
The government claims that the measures will reduce
red tape for small businesses making it easier for them to do business. We
believe, however, that it will reduce the availability of credit and stifle the
economy rather than the claimed positive alternative. Our argument focuses on
four key issues. Firstly, to abridge or abbreviate accounts – or indeed any
document – you first need to have the full version to work from. Filing less information
does not, therefore, reduce the preparation time, indeed if anything it will
increase it. Secondly, the presentation of prepayments and accrued income, and
accruals and deferred income is vital to understanding the true financial
position of a business and to being certain that it is solvent.
Thirdly, the absence of reported information will
encourage suppliers to simply refuse requests for trade credit rather than go
to the trouble of seeking more detailed information from the potential
customer, particularly when the amounts involved are small. It is these modest
transactions that accumulate into real economic activity and potential growth. Our
final argument is that by categorising a business that turns over £440,000 and
employs ten people in the same way as a genuine micro-business that might trade
solely on a cash basis is ludicrous. What is worse is that the turnover and net
assets limits have been substantially increased since the original discussion
paper was published in August 2011.
Another example of unintended consequences
resulting from a failure to listen adequately to the voices of those who live
in the real world, I fear.
No comments:
Post a Comment