Guest blog by Sue Kettle, Director of Membership and Support Services of the ICM - 'Love and Passion? Can this really be credit management?'

As Philip’s guest blogger, I deliberated long and hard on the theme and title of my blog. Would it be appropriate? Will it be taken in the context it’s meant? 

 

It didn’t take me long to feel at ease when I spotted a recent discussion posted on LinkedIn by a fellow colleague entitled ‘I love…’. With a smile and no real surprise I began to read the responses to the post that confirmed my thoughts. “I love the challenge” and “I love making a difference” to quotea couple.

From day one of joining ICM, and for the past 14 years, it has been so apparent from conversations with our members that the passion, commitment and excitement for credit management is boundless.

 

My early career was spent in a variety of industry sectors and I can honestly say the only passion and love I ever saw in those days was from an 11 o’clock diet coke break or an early finish.

 

One story that has always stuck with me, and I won't mention any names, was during my early days in membership when an individual who as applying to become a Member, who was so passionate about his job and his enthusiasm to join the credit community, he felt the need to call me from the bath to tell me he had reduced the companies DSO to 12 days, would this contribute to him achieving recognition as a credit professional?  To this day, he is now a long serving Member, I can't look at him with a straight face!

 

I feel, from my experience, I can honestly say credit professionals love their jobs with a passion and they are a breed that are not precious about their knowledge they have a longing desire to share and help others develop in the same way they have.

 

To all in the credit community let's nurture the professionals of the future to continue this infectious passion.

 

Yes, this really is Credit Management.

 

Sue Kettle

Director of Membership and Support Services

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Reading, writing and credit management'

Back in February the government announced a new draft National Curriculum for England that would see financial education embedded in both mathematics and in citizenship education, making financial capability a statutory part of the curriculum for the first time. The draft programme of study for citizenship would include the functions and uses of money, the importance of personal budgeting, money management and a range of financial products and services in Key Stage 3, and wages, taxes, credit, debt, financial risk and a range of more sophisticated financial products and services in Key Stage 4.

 

This week, following a period of consultation, Michael Gove published the revised Curriculum and the financial education has been further strengthened by the inclusion of 'risk management' into Key Stage 3 and 'income and expenditure, credit and debt, insurance, savings, pensions' at Key Stage 4. Recognition is due to pfeg for its work in pushing for this enhanced content.

 

Providing education that allows children to leave school with financial literacy can only bode well for the credit profession in the years ahead if it means consumers are more financially aware. None of us wants to see people in financial difficulty through ignorance because they weren't sufficiently aware or informed.

 

In my blog last week I called for the OFT to ensure that affordability tests were genuinely being carried out by payday lenders to avoid the vulnerable being caught in a vortex of indebtedness. An interesting discussion has unfolded in response on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group (you can find it here) I don't agree with all the comments - simply outlawing payday lending could carry serious unintended consequences involving a growth in back street loan sharks, for example - but action in the short term is needed and, for the longer term, education will also play its part. Now we need to make sure teachers are provided with adequate tools to deliver the proposed curriculum content.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Making a date with Destiny'

My Executive Assistant at ICM HQ, Tracy Carter, is also responsible for driving our social media strategy and activity. Last week she started a discussion on LinkedIn that has generated a riveting discussion. The question she posed was: "I had an interesting conversation with my 13 year old nephew about choosing a career, and he asked me if a career in credit management would be good and if it is important? How would you answer?"

There have been plenty of long-standing credit professionals like me saying what a brilliant career credit management is. They have highlighted positive aspects of the profession such as the variety it brings, the different skills it develops, the fact that it touches every part of the business, and delivers real value in many ways.

Some, including much younger contributors than me I'm pleased to say, have recognised that the role will become more strategic and less operational as technology continues to change the way we work. Others have stressed the need for personal and professional development as a way of building what is an interesting and satisfying job into a real career.

As with all discussion forums, the debate deviates from the original question and there is some disagreement, but the divergence of views adds to the vibrancy of the thread and I'm pleased to note that the underlying mood has remained positive. It should do so because many of the very senior people in credit I know could vouch for the career prospects as they have reached the top of their chosen profession and become key players within their own businesses.

As I write these words, I'm preparing for the latest quarterly meeting of the ICM Credit Industry Think Tank, the participants on which are all a testament to the opportunities afforded by credit management as a profession. Credit management is a dynamic and thriving profession and Tracy's nephew can be assured that it would be a good career choice. But let's not kid him. The reality is that it will be down to him to take hold of the opportunity with both hands and make the most of it. As one of the contributors to the LinkedIn discussion said: "....each individual is responsible for their own destiny."

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'New Directive leaves authorities doing the maths'

So, the deadline for transposition of the EU Late Payment Directive 2011/07/EU finally arrives this Saturday and the UK government has met the deadline and even issued a Users’ Guide that can be found here.

 

I don't want to go into great detail about the Guide, Directive or Statutory Instrument here, but one paragraph in the Guide has really caught my attention. The paragraph in question within the 'Payment between public authorities and business' section says: ‘If you are a Public Authority..........If you do not pay within the deadline, you are obliged to automatically pay the outstanding amount that includes daily interest for every day payment is late based on 8 percentage points above the Bank of England’s reference rate plus the fixed amount, depending on the size of the unpaid debt. The onus is on you to pay your supplier on time and the supplier is not obliged to remind you that payment is outstanding."

 

The public authority customer is therefore expected to proactively recognise that it is paying late, calculate the late payment charges/interest and add the amount to the remittance regardless of whether the creditor asks for the amount or not! Now, I don't want to be a cynic but what are the chances of this actually working in practice? I can see all sorts of issues and difficulties: how, for example, are authorities going to know they are expected to do this? Who is going to make the calculation and approve the additional payment? How is the increased value going to be matched to the original purchase order? I'd be interested to hear views from readers with their opinion of how they see this working. Please email me at ceo@icm.org.uk or go to the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group, or the Discussion Forum on the ICM website members area’ and let me know.

  

Finally, I have to mention Start-Up Loans. I'm privileged to have been involved on the Board of the company since its launch and I'm incredibly proud of its success as demonstrated by the announcement this week that the scheme has exceeded expectations as 2,000 aspirational young entrepreneurs have now received support (a loan supported by mentoring) to help get their business venture off the ground. The scheme has already reached its £10 million pilot spend, and a further £5.5 million injection of funding was approved this week in Parliament to fulfill its pipeline until the end of the month. The Government has made £117.5 million available to fund the Start-Up Loans scheme up to 2015. Amidst all of the sometimes dubious schemes our government has come up with in recent times, this is one where it appears to have got it right.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Celebrating success'

I'm writing these words ahead of the ICM British Credit awards which are taking place at the Hilton, Park Lane. A night of celebration, networking and fun with about 400 people, many of whom will be hoping that their entry to the Awards has done enough to earn them success. They should all however recognise the achievement of being short-listed - there may only be one trophy but they're all winners!

The success of the Awards has made me reflect on the power of social media. When we held our last Awards Dinner in February 2011, I think I'd just started Tweeting and I was certainly a novice. Since that time, Twitter has emerged as a powerful source and - in many respects - an effective tool. I'm an avid personal user (@philipkingicm) of Twitter but the ICM's corporate social media activity (@icmorg) is driven by my long-suffering Executive Assistant, Tracy Carter (@tracycarter) and she ensures that our activity is as effective as possible, constantly watching for new developments such as pinterest which we'll be using to post pictures from the Awards Dinner at the event and afterwards (http://pinterest.com/icmorg/icm-credit-awards-2013/).

Whether you're a user of social media or not, and whether you believe it has a place or not, there can be no doubt that it is having a major impact. I've just finished listening to Nick Robinson's book 'Live from Downing Street' and he makes the point that phenomena like Twitter mean that politicians and broadcasters are no longer able to control the timing of news being released in the way they were able to just a few years ago. 

The last few days has seen frenetic activity on Twitter and LinkedIn as we count down to our Awards evening, and hundreds of conversations and exchanges have taken place that would never have happened without Twitter. Real conversations are still the best form of communication but let's not knock anything that complements them and allows for networking and communication that otherwise wouldn't exist at all.

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A Christmas wish'

I asked a question on the ICM Credit Community group on LinkedIn recently and have had some interesting responses.

 

The question was: if Father Christmas were to bring you one gift that would really help you and/or your team be more effective in 2013, what would it be? There's still time for you to respond at http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=94851&trk=hb_side_g but posts so far can be split into three broad categories: practicalities; economic outlook; and professionalism.

 

The first comprises a wish-list including such things as: a crystal ball; a dictionary and thesaurus; more time; a cure for arthritis; better management systems; paying clients; sight of customers' management information; and a tool to force people to tell the truth! The second includes a wish for a steep economic upturn and a positive, optimistic view of the world. And the third, professionalism, covers: the desire for more networking; investment in the recruitment, retention and development of good credit people; and the resulting improvement that such investment delivers.

 

I'm afraid the ICM's ability to deliver some of the aspirations in the first category is limited, particularly in the field of arthritis (a cure for which I would certainly welcome if it were possible) but I'm pleased that our members are able to influence the second through our contact with the business/political community. I'm even more pleased that we're able to play a significant role in achieving the desires expressed in the third.

 

As I've often said in these blogs, we are all about driving professionalism, and developing services to support this ambition. As the recognised standard in credit management, our motivation is to raise the professionalism of people working in credit management by providing them with the opportunity to develop their skills, knowledge, and expertise in such a way that credit management is seen more and more as a profession in its own right.

 

I'll share some more thoughts from the discussion next week and also the wishes of the senior management team at ICM HQ; in the meantime I'm off to prepare for the ICM's Regional Roadshow in Milton Keynes where I'm looking forward to meeting a large number of our members and learn from an excellent panel of speakers.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Standing tall and proud'

When I said in my blog last week that it was time for credit professionals to stand up, to be noticed, and to be proud, I was talking about the value they contribute to their organisations and to the wider economy. I'm glad to say that I'm seeing a trend that exemplifies the pride I'm talking about.

I've noticed an increasing number of ICM members who include their designatory letters - AICM, MICM, MICM(Grad), or FICM - on their business cards, their email signatures, their LinkedIn profiles, and elsewhere. These letters are not just given away when someone becomes an ICM member; they have to be earned by gaining qualifications and/or having their practical experience verified, validated and reviewed.

Some might say the practice is archaic but I believe those who have earned them should be proud of their achievement and are right to use them in this way. If you don't tell people what you've achieved, who else will?

I've also seen a marked increase in the number of ICM members wearing the ICM badges we launched earlier this year. This, too, is a good way of promoting your professionalism and - if you don't have a badge - simply email icmmembership@icm.org.uk and we'll be delighted to send you one.

Don't be a shrinking violet!

Guest blog by Tracy Carter, Executive Assistant to Philip King, Institute of Credit Management

I was happy to accept the invitation to be a guest blogger until I realised that my blog would be following Nigel Fields’, a member of the Institute of Credit Management whose blog included the line “I have the best job in the world in ‘the movie business’ at Twentieth Century Fox”!  How do I follow that?  Well, I also feel that I’m lucky in my role; I work as part of a vibrant, enthusiastic and driven senior management team, for an Institute whose staff and members are completely committed to the work of the Institute and the credit management profession.

 

In addition to my varied executive assistant role, I’m also responsible for driving the Institute’s social media strategy.  I am truly passionate about social media, and particularly the benefits of social media as a communication tool for the ICM; our LinkedIn Group (ICM Credit Community) and Twitter account (@ICMorg) are good examples of how we can share what we’re doing, enter into discussions, and listen to credit management professionals.

 

Over recent months I’ve had the opportunity to speak, share ideas and offer advice to organisations, ICM branches, ICM members, and other professional bodies who are driving social media – the common feeling I’ve encountered is nervousness.  My advice is to ignore the nerves – start as an observer – sign up to LinkedIn and Twitter and watch for a while - you’ll soon discover a new world that you may even want to converse with.

 

Social networking is here to stay, and just like the arrival of email, it’s a communication tool that everyone can utilise – it’s happening with or without you! 

  

If you’d like to read Philip King’s weekly blog and other guest blogs click here or visit our Twitter page http://twitter.com/ICMorg.  You can also follow me on Twitter @TracyCarter.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Pre-holiday blues!'

Holidays from work – what a strange phenomenon!

We spend days or weeks planning to ensure things are taken care of while we're away; we work harder to make sure everything is as up-to-date as it can be; we look further ahead so that we're ready for events occurring soon after we return; then we head off to relax, even if a ‘holiday’ is just time at home to ‘chill’.

Then we return to an overflowing inbox and spend days or weeks working extra long days to catch up on those emails, meeting with colleagues to bring ourselves up-to-speed on what's happened while we've been way, sorting out things that might need attention, and complaining that it would have been easier if we'd never gone away! How many times have you heard someone say they'll need a holiday to recover from the effort involved in catching up from the last one!?

Of course, life goes on perfectly well without us. The economic travails of the country continue, and a couple of weeks passes in no time. We know holidays are a good thing to refresh and recharge the batteries so that we can bring the best to our roles through the rest of the year. I know I've seen some colleagues return from a holiday recently and been pleased by the positive effect their break has so obviously had as they settle back into routine. I'm currently going through the pre-holiday stress and will no doubt go through the post-holiday catching up trauma in a couple of weeks, despite those well intended resolutions while I'm away to get a better work-life balance and create more 'me time'.

This is the one time in the year when I genuinely turn off email, Twitter, LinkedIn and voicemail and switch off from the routine, and I have to say I'm really looking forward to it. For the first time in 28 years, I'm going abroad for a holiday with my wife unaccompanied by any of our children – just the two of us. I fear Mary might just need another holiday to recover from two weeks away with me!

While I'm away, I'm delighted to introduce two guest blog-writers. Next week, Nigel Fields Credit Director at Twentieth Century Fox and a Fellow of the ICM will be sharing some thoughts, and the week after it will be the turn of my very patient, loyal, and long-suffering Executive Assistant, Tracy Carter. I'll look forward to returning in a couple of weeks if I'm not too busy catching up on all those emails, meeting with colleagues to bring myself up to speed on what's been happening while I've been away, and needing a holiday to recover from all the catching up from the one I haven't even started yet!

Weekly Blog by Philiip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Promoting the credit profession across government'

I spent most of yesterday in a room at HM Treasury for a workshop with representatives from a number of government departments. We were discussing and exploring debt management across government, and I was the non-governmental participant invited to bring a perspective from the private sector and the wider credit profession. It was an interesting and fascinating day where a wide range of issues and views were expressed.

It would naturally be wrong to detail our discussions but suffice to say I was pleased to be able to share my thinking – as so often expressed in these blogs – about the importance of professionalism in credit management, the importance of providing a career pathway to that professionalism, and the importance of recognising that professionalism when it is achieved and delivered.

We explored the core values, behaviours, and skills required in a credit professional and there were no surprises in the discussion output. The effective credit professional has attributes and characteristics that are common regardless of the sector or industry in which he or she works and, of course, the ICM plays its part in bringing these attributes to the fore. Whether it is through our learning and development short-courses and qualifications, our Continuing Professional Development scheme, or our networking activity made up of branch, regional and national events and online forums, the ultimate objective is the same: to promote and enhance professionalism in our credit community.

Many of our members work in the public sector and add real value to their organisations; it was good to explore how that value might be further enhanced.

Finally, the LIBOR scandal that has overwhelmed us in recent days makes me wonder if any of the participants were members of professional bodies and subject to ethical codes. If so, I hope those professional bodies will be opening files within their complaints and disciplinary regimes. Very occasionally we have to deal with complaints and take action against an ICM member under our Ethical Code and it is right that we do so. Integrity is a fundamental part of the professionalism we all promote and want to see.

To find out more about the Institute of Credit Management visit http://www.icm.org.uk/ or follow http://www.twitter.com/icmorg or http://www.twitter.com/philipkingicm

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The real definition of professionalism'

A month ago I started a discussion on the ICM Credit Community Group on LinkedIn asking: "What does professionalism mean to you?" The question generated some great responses that used words and phrases including: fair; knowledgeable; focused; integrity; confidence; experience; seeing the bigger picture; keeping up to date; reputation; experience; considered judgment; ethics; calmness; credibility; and stability.

Yesterday I spent a long day in a London office meeting a series of people who demonstrated professionalism in credit management in the truest sense - they were credible, competent and could obviously apply their knowledge in the real business world. Although not the strict definition, I believe someone displaying professionalism is someone who exudes a sense of confidence in themselves and to those around them. After all, that confidence comes from all the qualities and attributes mentioned above. If I'm going to rely on someone in any walk of life I'm going to want them to be confident in themselves and I'm going to want to sense that confidence when I'm in contact with them.

The ICM in recent times has been particularly encouraging its members to be proud of their professionalism and not to be 'shrinking violets'. Good credit management is vital to the sustainability and success of businesses and we shouldn't be afraid to say so, nor to broadcast the value we add to our organisations. A recent web clipping of a survey by Marks Sattin, a recruitment organisation, shows that pay rises for credit managers averaged 7% last year and were three times greater than those of other accountancy professionals. The accompanying press release talks about the enhanced significance and greater prominence given to credit management and supports the Institute's argument that the contribution of credit professionals is invaluable and indisputable.

Sadly, we all see examples of people showing a real lack of professionalism (including from time to time by their comments and behaviours on LinkedIn discussion forums and elsewhere) but let's make sure that those individuals remain a small minority and that we can genuinely be proud of our profession. If you're an ICM member and want to demonstrate your pride by wearing an ICM Badge, please simply send an email to members@icm.org.uk quoting your correct email address, saying how many people currently work in your credit department, and telling us the single most important thing you value from your ICM membership.

Finally can I remind you that the ICM Member Survey is still open and you can complete it here. We've been overwhelmed by the response to date but the more responses we have, the better informed will be our future planning. Can I also remind you that the latest ICM UK Credit Managers' Index opened this week - so please join the panel and respond here.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A source for good'

A slightly unusual topic for me this week prompted by recent personal experience. I was involved with a police force at the weekend about a missing person. The details and circumstances aren't important but the police wanted to know everything I knew about the missing person who has gone AWOL many miles from home and may need help.

My wife and I shared all we knew (which wasn't much to be honest) and my wife referred the police to Facebook which included a number of friends in the area where they were looking, and had comments that might give clues as to their whereabouts. We were asked if we had a picture of the individual and we confirmed we had but pointed out that a more recent and clearer one was on Facebook.

Extraordinarily, a few minutes later we received a phone call asking if we could download the picture and email it, along with any other relevant information, because the police didn't have access to Facebook and so couldn't use that source of information! I don't know if this is common to all police forces and I don't know the detailed reasons why access is denied but - in today's age - I was incredulous that such a productive source of information couldn't be used!

I discussed the use of Facebook in tracing debtors following the release of the OFT's Debt Collection Guidance a few weeks ago and shared my view that the content of the guidance was being misrepresented by the media. We've also recently heard the ongoing debate about how social media was insufficiently monitored during the riots across the UK in the summer.

Social media is a powerful tool that can be used for good - as well as bad - but it strikes me that the potential 'dangers' of Facebook et al and sensitivities over privacy, while understandable, are getting in the way of progress. It certainly seems absurd that the police could not pursue what to me would have been a blindingly obvious line of enquiry.

Whether we like it or not, social media is here to stay and we can't just ignore it. The ICM has heavily embraced Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook because we know a proportion of our members are using them and we see many benefits.

I fear, however, that in certain cases bureaucracy is winning and the loser is someone who could really need help!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The changing 'Face' of Debt Guidance'

Since mentioning the publication of the new OFT Debt Collection Guidance in my blog last week, I've now had chance to look through it in detail. No great surprises; it's very similar to the draft on which we were consulted some time ago and says what I guess we'd all largely expect it to say. It is, after all, only an update of the version of the document issued in June 2003.

The aspect that seems to have caused the greatest debate on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group, and elsewhere, is the OFT warning to debt collectors not to use social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook to pursue people who owe them money. I don't want to be pedantic here but I'm not sure that's exactly what it says. Actually what it says is that unfair or improper practice would include 'acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor...' which includes, as one of the examples quoted 'posting messages on social networking sites in a way that might potentially reveal that an identifiable person is being pursued for the repayment of a debt'. That's a long way from banning the use of Facebook!

I might be showing my age here but I remember lecturing ICM evening classes at Watford College in the 1980's and recall teaching about s40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which addressed the unlawful harassment of debtors and included the works: 'A person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under a contract, he harasses the other with demands for payment which, in respect of their frequency, or the manner or occasion of making any such demand, or of any threat or publicity by which any demand is accompanied, are calculated to subject him or members of his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation'.

So nothing has changed really; in those days, the example of harassment was parking a van outside someone's house with the words 'debt collector' written on the side. Surely all we're talking about here is the 2011 equivalent? There's nothing wrong with using social networking tools to find people or to learn more about them but harassing people by any means is - and must be - unacceptable. Those who have seen me present using a baseball bat as a visual aid will know that such a bat is an equally unacceptable collection tool!

I am intrigued by the following words in the Foreword: 'This guidance document is not intended to provide a basis for debtors to avoid the repayment of debts duly owed. We consider that debtors should take responsibility for engaging appropriately in the debt recovery process...'. On the one hand, I am encouraged by its inclusion; on the other, the fact that they have to write these words at all makes me think that the document is weighted heavily in favour of debtors. We shouldn't lose sight of the fact that taking on debt carries with it an obligation to repay it, and that should always be the starting point.

The Guidance carries considerable detail and Consumer Credit licence holders would do well to read it and ensure they, and any third party organisations working for them, are complying with it.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'feeding the sausage machine'

Rachel Bridge, the Enterprise Editor of The Sunday Times, wrote a really interesting article at the weekend about credit insurance. It talked about a sausage maker in Devon which took out credit insurance a few years ago after suffering a bad debt of £22,000. The finance director was quoted as saying that "if our credit insurer will provide cover up to a certain limit, then we will trade. If not, we will think again. We either do not do business with that customer, or we trade on different terms, perhaps asking for money upfront".

The article went on to outline how the amount of cover provided by the big three insurers has increased over the past year, and how some have introduced new measures and more user-friendly policies. Fabrice Desnos, Xavier Denecker, and Marc Jones from Euler Hermes, Coface, and Atradius respectively were all quoted and - since all three are good friends of the ICM - it made me read the article more carefully.

It was a useful and practical guide to what is a difficult product for many SMEs to understand and, indeed, for government ministers to get their heads around. I remember many conversations a couple of years ago trying to explain how credit insurance works without ever feeling I was making much progress. Credit insurers were coming in for some pretty bad press at that time, some of it deserved, but the sector has moved on, and so too its products. Credit insurance in the right circumstances can be a really useful tool for business, including small ones, and I'm pleased to see it being explained by a respected journalist to whom SMEs will listen.

There's been a recent interesting debate on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group about whether credit managers who have no bad debt are the good ones. My view is that good credit professionals understand the balance of risk and reward and accept bad debts as a price of profitable sales activity, but that doesn't alter the fact that the impact of a bad debt - particularly to small businesses and especially if it is relatively disproportionate - can be devastating. Anything that helps SMEs to understand better how to manage credit and risk is to be welcomed.

LinkedIn ICM Credit Community

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'To tweet or not to tweet'

Tweeting to Rachel Bridge of the Sunday Times, recently, made me realise just how far we have come in our social networking strategy.

We've now been actively tweeting for over a year (philipkingicm: 1,244 tweets; 389 followers / icmorg: 313 tweets; 145 followers), I've been writing this weekly blog for almost ten months (this is my 41st), and our LinkedIn group (ICM Credit Community) has amassed 1,745 members. These numbers both impress me by how quickly they've grown, and disappoint me in that so many people aren't engaging.

The reality of course is that we are all different; we all want to consume news and communicate in different ways. For some, our magazine Credit Management is the only communication they want to receive; others want email contact; and others want a mix.

And this of course isn't limited to contact from organisations like the ICM; it flows through all aspects of life. I can't remember the last time I watched the TV news yet I'm an avid listener to news on the radio; I've recently become a Kindle convert yet I always insisted I never would because I love books so much.

So what's my point? I've recently seen examples of just how powerful Twitter and LinkedIn can be in generating contact and communication (particularly with the press) that otherwise wouldn't happen. The Sunday Times coverage for the ICM ten days ago came as a direct consequence of a Twitter conversation between me and the Enterprise Editor. I'm making contact with some of our Members in an informal way that would not take place by phone or email, simply because Twitter and LinkedIn provide the opportunity to do so, and those conversations sometimes lead to deeper, 'real' conversations as a consequence.

We shouldn't be afraid to embrace new technology and ideas. Some will fail early, some will last a while then diminish (Friends Reunited is a good example), and others will get stronger - although there's already talk that Facebook's popularity is starting to decline precisely at the point when some of us are just beginning to understand its value. Twitter, too, will no doubt one day reach saturation point and outgrow itself. For now though, by being selective about who I follow, Twitter provides me with access to news, views, information, and contact that I might otherwise miss or at least not see so quickly. It is therefore useful. And I've talked to credit professionals who use these media as a way of knowing their customers better and that can pay real dividends!

http://twitter.com/philipkingicm
http://twitter.com/#!/icmorg
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=94851

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Do skills make a difference?'

I shared an interesting discussion with several business organisations and accountancy bodies at BIS this week, focused on the 'skills agenda' for SMEs. Of course it set me thinking: How does a small business identify what skills it needs to help it get established and grow? How does it know which are essential as opposed to merely 'nice to have' and which will make a real tangible difference? When issues are identified, how does it differentiate between those that are caused by a skills gap and those caused by external factors over which it has no control?

And it made me think of other questions: How does it deliver the necessary skills it identifies to the owners and/or staff? Can the skills be taught or would they be better learned on the job through a hands-on approach? How can it ensure the skills learned feed through to the benefit of the business? And how does it calculate payback, establish whether the investment was worthwhile, and validate that it's really making a difference?

Small businesses don't have Training or HR departments, they certainly don't have big training budgets, and often won't have a mechanism to encourage staff development. The consequence may be that the employees fail to grow and the business misses the benefits that would result from the investment. I've started a related discussion on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn Group http://linkd.in/jCFJGi and would be interested in views from credit professionals.

I'm writing these words in the grounds of Leeds Castle after another successful ICM Regional Breakfast Roadshow - there were over 500 years of credit management experience in the room and that's where the real value of the ICM credit community shows its worth.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - What would convince you?

A few weeks ago, in the light of an Insolvency Service consultation, I started making noises through my blog, the pages of Credit Management magazine and the ICM Briefing to gauge the depth of our Members' feelings. I also started a discussion on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group http://linkd.in/iF2Q0b asking a simple question: Do you engage in insolvencies after you suffer a bad debt?

The fundamental issue for me then and now is how we get credit professionals to engage more actively in insolvency procedures to ensure they get the best outcome, and so that they are better able to monitor the activity and efforts of the IP. I sought to find out what might encourage our Members to engage more, or whether they simply saw it as a complete waste of time and effort. The responses have been most interesting, with some clear themes emerging.

One of the themes is that credit professionals who understand insolvency procedures understand that engagement delivers tangible benefits. They are better able to ensure the best outcome for their business (even though that outcome is rarely, if ever, likely to be particularly good and merely the best of a bad job!): sometimes, knowledge and engagement can identify options that might not otherwise have been considered.

A further theme is that credit professionals who do not understand insolvency currently will very much need to in the future. I'm glad to say these are still very much part of the ICM qualification pathway; they are included in our short-course menu, and are often the subject of debate and discussion at our regional and branch events.

The one question that wasn't really answered was what would encourage those credit professionals who consider involvement a waste of time and effort to do so. We might not have all the answers just yet, but the ICM has started to work more closely with organisations like R3 and the IPA and is increasing awareness of the key issues with a regular column in the magazine. It is a start, but there is much more to be done if we're going to convince the unconverted!

www.icm.org.uk