Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Celebrating success'

I'm writing these words ahead of the ICM British Credit awards which are taking place at the Hilton, Park Lane. A night of celebration, networking and fun with about 400 people, many of whom will be hoping that their entry to the Awards has done enough to earn them success. They should all however recognise the achievement of being short-listed - there may only be one trophy but they're all winners!

The success of the Awards has made me reflect on the power of social media. When we held our last Awards Dinner in February 2011, I think I'd just started Tweeting and I was certainly a novice. Since that time, Twitter has emerged as a powerful source and - in many respects - an effective tool. I'm an avid personal user (@philipkingicm) of Twitter but the ICM's corporate social media activity (@icmorg) is driven by my long-suffering Executive Assistant, Tracy Carter (@tracycarter) and she ensures that our activity is as effective as possible, constantly watching for new developments such as pinterest which we'll be using to post pictures from the Awards Dinner at the event and afterwards (http://pinterest.com/icmorg/icm-credit-awards-2013/).

Whether you're a user of social media or not, and whether you believe it has a place or not, there can be no doubt that it is having a major impact. I've just finished listening to Nick Robinson's book 'Live from Downing Street' and he makes the point that phenomena like Twitter mean that politicians and broadcasters are no longer able to control the timing of news being released in the way they were able to just a few years ago. 

The last few days has seen frenetic activity on Twitter and LinkedIn as we count down to our Awards evening, and hundreds of conversations and exchanges have taken place that would never have happened without Twitter. Real conversations are still the best form of communication but let's not knock anything that complements them and allows for networking and communication that otherwise wouldn't exist at all.

 

Guest blog by Tracy Carter, Executive Assistant to Philip King, Institute of Credit Management

I was happy to accept the invitation to be a guest blogger until I realised that my blog would be following Nigel Fields’, a member of the Institute of Credit Management whose blog included the line “I have the best job in the world in ‘the movie business’ at Twentieth Century Fox”!  How do I follow that?  Well, I also feel that I’m lucky in my role; I work as part of a vibrant, enthusiastic and driven senior management team, for an Institute whose staff and members are completely committed to the work of the Institute and the credit management profession.

 

In addition to my varied executive assistant role, I’m also responsible for driving the Institute’s social media strategy.  I am truly passionate about social media, and particularly the benefits of social media as a communication tool for the ICM; our LinkedIn Group (ICM Credit Community) and Twitter account (@ICMorg) are good examples of how we can share what we’re doing, enter into discussions, and listen to credit management professionals.

 

Over recent months I’ve had the opportunity to speak, share ideas and offer advice to organisations, ICM branches, ICM members, and other professional bodies who are driving social media – the common feeling I’ve encountered is nervousness.  My advice is to ignore the nerves – start as an observer – sign up to LinkedIn and Twitter and watch for a while - you’ll soon discover a new world that you may even want to converse with.

 

Social networking is here to stay, and just like the arrival of email, it’s a communication tool that everyone can utilise – it’s happening with or without you! 

  

If you’d like to read Philip King’s weekly blog and other guest blogs click here or visit our Twitter page http://twitter.com/ICMorg.  You can also follow me on Twitter @TracyCarter.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Pre-holiday blues!'

Holidays from work – what a strange phenomenon!

We spend days or weeks planning to ensure things are taken care of while we're away; we work harder to make sure everything is as up-to-date as it can be; we look further ahead so that we're ready for events occurring soon after we return; then we head off to relax, even if a ‘holiday’ is just time at home to ‘chill’.

Then we return to an overflowing inbox and spend days or weeks working extra long days to catch up on those emails, meeting with colleagues to bring ourselves up-to-speed on what's happened while we've been way, sorting out things that might need attention, and complaining that it would have been easier if we'd never gone away! How many times have you heard someone say they'll need a holiday to recover from the effort involved in catching up from the last one!?

Of course, life goes on perfectly well without us. The economic travails of the country continue, and a couple of weeks passes in no time. We know holidays are a good thing to refresh and recharge the batteries so that we can bring the best to our roles through the rest of the year. I know I've seen some colleagues return from a holiday recently and been pleased by the positive effect their break has so obviously had as they settle back into routine. I'm currently going through the pre-holiday stress and will no doubt go through the post-holiday catching up trauma in a couple of weeks, despite those well intended resolutions while I'm away to get a better work-life balance and create more 'me time'.

This is the one time in the year when I genuinely turn off email, Twitter, LinkedIn and voicemail and switch off from the routine, and I have to say I'm really looking forward to it. For the first time in 28 years, I'm going abroad for a holiday with my wife unaccompanied by any of our children – just the two of us. I fear Mary might just need another holiday to recover from two weeks away with me!

While I'm away, I'm delighted to introduce two guest blog-writers. Next week, Nigel Fields Credit Director at Twentieth Century Fox and a Fellow of the ICM will be sharing some thoughts, and the week after it will be the turn of my very patient, loyal, and long-suffering Executive Assistant, Tracy Carter. I'll look forward to returning in a couple of weeks if I'm not too busy catching up on all those emails, meeting with colleagues to bring myself up to speed on what's been happening while I've been away, and needing a holiday to recover from all the catching up from the one I haven't even started yet!

Weekly Blog by Philiip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Promoting the credit profession across government'

I spent most of yesterday in a room at HM Treasury for a workshop with representatives from a number of government departments. We were discussing and exploring debt management across government, and I was the non-governmental participant invited to bring a perspective from the private sector and the wider credit profession. It was an interesting and fascinating day where a wide range of issues and views were expressed.

It would naturally be wrong to detail our discussions but suffice to say I was pleased to be able to share my thinking – as so often expressed in these blogs – about the importance of professionalism in credit management, the importance of providing a career pathway to that professionalism, and the importance of recognising that professionalism when it is achieved and delivered.

We explored the core values, behaviours, and skills required in a credit professional and there were no surprises in the discussion output. The effective credit professional has attributes and characteristics that are common regardless of the sector or industry in which he or she works and, of course, the ICM plays its part in bringing these attributes to the fore. Whether it is through our learning and development short-courses and qualifications, our Continuing Professional Development scheme, or our networking activity made up of branch, regional and national events and online forums, the ultimate objective is the same: to promote and enhance professionalism in our credit community.

Many of our members work in the public sector and add real value to their organisations; it was good to explore how that value might be further enhanced.

Finally, the LIBOR scandal that has overwhelmed us in recent days makes me wonder if any of the participants were members of professional bodies and subject to ethical codes. If so, I hope those professional bodies will be opening files within their complaints and disciplinary regimes. Very occasionally we have to deal with complaints and take action against an ICM member under our Ethical Code and it is right that we do so. Integrity is a fundamental part of the professionalism we all promote and want to see.

To find out more about the Institute of Credit Management visit http://www.icm.org.uk/ or follow http://www.twitter.com/icmorg or http://www.twitter.com/philipkingicm

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'A source for good'

A slightly unusual topic for me this week prompted by recent personal experience. I was involved with a police force at the weekend about a missing person. The details and circumstances aren't important but the police wanted to know everything I knew about the missing person who has gone AWOL many miles from home and may need help.

My wife and I shared all we knew (which wasn't much to be honest) and my wife referred the police to Facebook which included a number of friends in the area where they were looking, and had comments that might give clues as to their whereabouts. We were asked if we had a picture of the individual and we confirmed we had but pointed out that a more recent and clearer one was on Facebook.

Extraordinarily, a few minutes later we received a phone call asking if we could download the picture and email it, along with any other relevant information, because the police didn't have access to Facebook and so couldn't use that source of information! I don't know if this is common to all police forces and I don't know the detailed reasons why access is denied but - in today's age - I was incredulous that such a productive source of information couldn't be used!

I discussed the use of Facebook in tracing debtors following the release of the OFT's Debt Collection Guidance a few weeks ago and shared my view that the content of the guidance was being misrepresented by the media. We've also recently heard the ongoing debate about how social media was insufficiently monitored during the riots across the UK in the summer.

Social media is a powerful tool that can be used for good - as well as bad - but it strikes me that the potential 'dangers' of Facebook et al and sensitivities over privacy, while understandable, are getting in the way of progress. It certainly seems absurd that the police could not pursue what to me would have been a blindingly obvious line of enquiry.

Whether we like it or not, social media is here to stay and we can't just ignore it. The ICM has heavily embraced Twitter, LinkedIn and Facebook because we know a proportion of our members are using them and we see many benefits.

I fear, however, that in certain cases bureaucracy is winning and the loser is someone who could really need help!

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The changing 'Face' of Debt Guidance'

Since mentioning the publication of the new OFT Debt Collection Guidance in my blog last week, I've now had chance to look through it in detail. No great surprises; it's very similar to the draft on which we were consulted some time ago and says what I guess we'd all largely expect it to say. It is, after all, only an update of the version of the document issued in June 2003.

The aspect that seems to have caused the greatest debate on the ICM Credit Community LinkedIn group, and elsewhere, is the OFT warning to debt collectors not to use social networking sites such as Twitter and Facebook to pursue people who owe them money. I don't want to be pedantic here but I'm not sure that's exactly what it says. Actually what it says is that unfair or improper practice would include 'acting in a way likely to be publicly embarrassing to the debtor...' which includes, as one of the examples quoted 'posting messages on social networking sites in a way that might potentially reveal that an identifiable person is being pursued for the repayment of a debt'. That's a long way from banning the use of Facebook!

I might be showing my age here but I remember lecturing ICM evening classes at Watford College in the 1980's and recall teaching about s40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970 which addressed the unlawful harassment of debtors and included the works: 'A person commits an offence if, with the object of coercing another person to pay money claimed from the other as a debt due under a contract, he harasses the other with demands for payment which, in respect of their frequency, or the manner or occasion of making any such demand, or of any threat or publicity by which any demand is accompanied, are calculated to subject him or members of his family or household to alarm, distress or humiliation'.

So nothing has changed really; in those days, the example of harassment was parking a van outside someone's house with the words 'debt collector' written on the side. Surely all we're talking about here is the 2011 equivalent? There's nothing wrong with using social networking tools to find people or to learn more about them but harassing people by any means is - and must be - unacceptable. Those who have seen me present using a baseball bat as a visual aid will know that such a bat is an equally unacceptable collection tool!

I am intrigued by the following words in the Foreword: 'This guidance document is not intended to provide a basis for debtors to avoid the repayment of debts duly owed. We consider that debtors should take responsibility for engaging appropriately in the debt recovery process...'. On the one hand, I am encouraged by its inclusion; on the other, the fact that they have to write these words at all makes me think that the document is weighted heavily in favour of debtors. We shouldn't lose sight of the fact that taking on debt carries with it an obligation to repay it, and that should always be the starting point.

The Guidance carries considerable detail and Consumer Credit licence holders would do well to read it and ensure they, and any third party organisations working for them, are complying with it.

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'The two 'faces' of Twitter and social media'

During the summer riots, there was much talk of the influence of Facebook, Twitter and other social media sites and their role in helping to organise and promote illegal activity. Last week I was reminded at a much more mundane and practical level of the power of Twitter in my working life.

I woke up last Wednesday morning to see a tweet from Chuka Umunna, the Shadow Business Minister, saying he was going to be speaking at a private members debate on late payment. He included a link to the parliment website and, as I was in the office on Wednesday, I was able to watch much of the debate live. I must confess that I had not realised that such debates took place in Westminster, other than in the main debating chamber itself. This one on late payment had been called by Debbie Abrahams, the Labour MP for Oldham East and Saddleworth, who was clearly passionate - and knowledgeable - about the subject.

The contributions from several MP's we know including Lorely Burt, and others we didn't previously, presented some strong arguments supported by background knowledge that was - in many cases - impressive. What was particularly encouraging was their knowledge of the work being undertaken by the ICM and it was gratifying to receive many mentions.*

Afterwards, I exchanged tweets with Debbie and we are planning to meet to discuss how she and her parlimentary colleagues, along with the ICM, can drive more engagement with the Prompt Payment Code and point SMEs towards the practical advice we can offer through, for example, the Managing Cashflow Guides.

I've also recently had some interesting conversations via twitter with Richard Tyler, Enterprise Editor at the Daily Telegraph, and I'm conscious that - without it - I would have been blissfully unaware of last week's debate and missed a real opportunity to engage with people who can be influential. I know there are downsides to social networking but, for me, the upsides can be pretty impressive too.

*For those interested, our press release following the debate can be found here, the transcript here, and the video recording here.

To follow me and the Institute of Credit Management on Twitter go to http://twitter.com/philipkingicm and http://twitter.com/ICMorg

The Prompt Payment Code

Managing Cashflow Guides

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'To tweet or not to tweet'

Tweeting to Rachel Bridge of the Sunday Times, recently, made me realise just how far we have come in our social networking strategy.

We've now been actively tweeting for over a year (philipkingicm: 1,244 tweets; 389 followers / icmorg: 313 tweets; 145 followers), I've been writing this weekly blog for almost ten months (this is my 41st), and our LinkedIn group (ICM Credit Community) has amassed 1,745 members. These numbers both impress me by how quickly they've grown, and disappoint me in that so many people aren't engaging.

The reality of course is that we are all different; we all want to consume news and communicate in different ways. For some, our magazine Credit Management is the only communication they want to receive; others want email contact; and others want a mix.

And this of course isn't limited to contact from organisations like the ICM; it flows through all aspects of life. I can't remember the last time I watched the TV news yet I'm an avid listener to news on the radio; I've recently become a Kindle convert yet I always insisted I never would because I love books so much.

So what's my point? I've recently seen examples of just how powerful Twitter and LinkedIn can be in generating contact and communication (particularly with the press) that otherwise wouldn't happen. The Sunday Times coverage for the ICM ten days ago came as a direct consequence of a Twitter conversation between me and the Enterprise Editor. I'm making contact with some of our Members in an informal way that would not take place by phone or email, simply because Twitter and LinkedIn provide the opportunity to do so, and those conversations sometimes lead to deeper, 'real' conversations as a consequence.

We shouldn't be afraid to embrace new technology and ideas. Some will fail early, some will last a while then diminish (Friends Reunited is a good example), and others will get stronger - although there's already talk that Facebook's popularity is starting to decline precisely at the point when some of us are just beginning to understand its value. Twitter, too, will no doubt one day reach saturation point and outgrow itself. For now though, by being selective about who I follow, Twitter provides me with access to news, views, information, and contact that I might otherwise miss or at least not see so quickly. It is therefore useful. And I've talked to credit professionals who use these media as a way of knowing their customers better and that can pay real dividends!

http://twitter.com/philipkingicm
http://twitter.com/#!/icmorg
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?home=&gid=94851