Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Catching the bus'

It's been a busy news week. I was interviewed on Jeff Randall Live on Sky News on Monday evening about the government's proposals to cap the cost of Payday Lending.  A bit like buses though, news stories of interest tend to come in twos and threes, and I had a view on the three main news stories the programme was covering.

Firstly, the Lawrence Tomlinson report containing allegations that RBS had pushed healthy small and medium-sized businesses into administration to strip their assets and then buy them back cheaply to make a profit.  As the MP Mark Garnier said in his interview: "I'm not a lawyer, but these allegations, if true, look a lot like fraud to me." How many credit professionals are looking back at bad debts incurred where they thought their decision to supply had been reasonable based on their assessment of customer risk only to be caught with a bad debt when the customer went in to insolvency and wondering if the allegations might be true?  Apart from the obvious impact on the businesses forced into insolvency, what might the wider impact on their suppliers and the economy be?

Secondly, the government was selling £900m of student loans to a debt management consortium for £160m. The loans had been taken out by students who started courses between 1990 and 1998.  Part of the reaction to the news was that debt collection companies would act irresponsibly and aggressively in recovering debts that have so far not been collected.  The Student Loans company doesn't have the best record in managing its loan book and particularly the older elements of the portfolio.  We're told the terms and conditions of the loans are not going to be changed as a result of the sale and, if engaging third parties increases the recovery of funds to the public purse, then I'm all for it.  Perhaps the debt collection companies will just apply good credit management principles and collect money that is overdue from people who can - and should - be repaying it.

Thirdly, the Chancellor's announcement that government will impose a duty on the FCA to cap the cost of payday lending.  Setting on one side the suggestion that the announcement is one of political expediency, there are bigger questions to be answered. How will the cap level be determined?  The quoting of the Australian model with its cap of 4% per month seems to overlook the 20% arrangement fee that can be charged, and the punitive penalties for late payment that can be applied.  And the last thing we want is for the cap to make short-term lenders flee the market forcing borrowers to use loan sharks instead.

I'm not averse to the principle of restricting overt profiteering that can exploit the most vulnerable but let's not forget that payday lenders aren't the only guilty parties here.  As I said to Jeff Randall, I went online and looked at what £100 payday loan for a month would cost.  I'd have to pay back £137.15. If I took an unauthorised overdraft on my current account with a High Street bank the cost would be £5 per day, capped at £95 in a month.  On another current account I looked at, the cap would be £150, and both of these accounts would also charge transaction fees on top.  On this comparison, charges of £37.15 sound a snip!

Equally big issues with payday lenders are the opportunity for borrowers to take out multiple loans with multiple lenders, the availability of repeated roll-overs, and - as I've said in this blog before - the failure of lenders to carry out adequate affordability checks ahead of granting loans.

Back to my buses analogy, I guess next week will be devoid of any significant news and we'll be back to following the exploits of celebrities and their social lives!

 

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Standing tall and proud'

When I said in my blog last week that it was time for credit professionals to stand up, to be noticed, and to be proud, I was talking about the value they contribute to their organisations and to the wider economy. I'm glad to say that I'm seeing a trend that exemplifies the pride I'm talking about.

I've noticed an increasing number of ICM members who include their designatory letters - AICM, MICM, MICM(Grad), or FICM - on their business cards, their email signatures, their LinkedIn profiles, and elsewhere. These letters are not just given away when someone becomes an ICM member; they have to be earned by gaining qualifications and/or having their practical experience verified, validated and reviewed.

Some might say the practice is archaic but I believe those who have earned them should be proud of their achievement and are right to use them in this way. If you don't tell people what you've achieved, who else will?

I've also seen a marked increase in the number of ICM members wearing the ICM badges we launched earlier this year. This, too, is a good way of promoting your professionalism and - if you don't have a badge - simply email icmmembership@icm.org.uk and we'll be delighted to send you one.

Don't be a shrinking violet!

Philip King, CEO of Institute of Credit Management (ICM) - 'Judge or Jury'

I had the privilege of sitting on the judging panel last week for the SME category of the National Business Awards. It was the first time I've been a judge where the nominees have to present a 'pitch' and it was a fascinating experience. I've always wondered what it felt like to be a dragon in the den, and I guess this is the closest I'll ever get to finding out!

There were 12 entries and we spent a long day listening to a series of presentations from a range of very diverse businesses. It was inspirational hearing from people who have turned an idea into a business that is thriving and, in some cases, hugely successful in a very short space of time.

The common theme, certainly among the front runners, was unbridled energy and enthusiasm and a passion for a business that entrepreneurs saw as 'their baby'. If those qualities could be replicated and reproduced across business, it's hard to believe we'd still be struggling to see the recovery for which we all yearn. So often, the idea was simple and certainly not rocket science. As a judge, I was left thinking why somebody else hadn't thought of it before and wishing I had a more creative mind that could spot what seemed like obvious opportunities once somebody else has pointed them out!

The Start-Up Loans Company in which I'm involved has now started lending and, at the Board Meeting this week, we were hearing examples of young people who are determined to turn an idea into a successful business and - judging by their determination - will do so.

On the political front, we've heard Vince Cable's announcement about the new Government-funded bank to support SMEs. The devil, as always, will be in the detail but I certainly welcome the plan to bring together in one place Government finance support for small and mid-sized businesses. As I've said here recently, the multiplicity and complexity of schemes often results in them almost working against each other so if the new bank helps to simplify and de-clutter the landscape, it can only be a good thing.

It was good to meet Michael Fallon, the new Business Minister, this week and I'm at the Labour and Conservative conferences over the next two weeks. It will be interesting to hear what the parties have to say at this mid-way point of the current Government.

Weekly Blog by Philiip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Promoting the credit profession across government'

I spent most of yesterday in a room at HM Treasury for a workshop with representatives from a number of government departments. We were discussing and exploring debt management across government, and I was the non-governmental participant invited to bring a perspective from the private sector and the wider credit profession. It was an interesting and fascinating day where a wide range of issues and views were expressed.

It would naturally be wrong to detail our discussions but suffice to say I was pleased to be able to share my thinking – as so often expressed in these blogs – about the importance of professionalism in credit management, the importance of providing a career pathway to that professionalism, and the importance of recognising that professionalism when it is achieved and delivered.

We explored the core values, behaviours, and skills required in a credit professional and there were no surprises in the discussion output. The effective credit professional has attributes and characteristics that are common regardless of the sector or industry in which he or she works and, of course, the ICM plays its part in bringing these attributes to the fore. Whether it is through our learning and development short-courses and qualifications, our Continuing Professional Development scheme, or our networking activity made up of branch, regional and national events and online forums, the ultimate objective is the same: to promote and enhance professionalism in our credit community.

Many of our members work in the public sector and add real value to their organisations; it was good to explore how that value might be further enhanced.

Finally, the LIBOR scandal that has overwhelmed us in recent days makes me wonder if any of the participants were members of professional bodies and subject to ethical codes. If so, I hope those professional bodies will be opening files within their complaints and disciplinary regimes. Very occasionally we have to deal with complaints and take action against an ICM member under our Ethical Code and it is right that we do so. Integrity is a fundamental part of the professionalism we all promote and want to see.

To find out more about the Institute of Credit Management visit http://www.icm.org.uk/ or follow http://www.twitter.com/icmorg or http://www.twitter.com/philipkingicm