Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Consistency, fairness and madness'

It is always interesting to see what comes out of the EU and compare ourselves with our fellow 'Europeans'. I was particularly intrigued, therefore, by a recent article in The Guardian http://bit.ly/i5tB9H that highlighted how the Irish are undertaking what they call 'bankruptcy tourism' - in short, taking advantage of the bankruptcy process in the UK as a better way out for entrepreneurs crushed by debt from the property boom.

Waiting 12 months to be declared bankrupt and start again is a considerably more attractive proposition than waiting the likely 12 years in Ireland, and so it set me thinking: isn't it about time that the EU looked more actively into bankruptcy and insolvency across Europe and introduced a modicum of consistency and uniformity among Member states? I am sure it would be well received, especially by creditors.

And while we are talking about the EU, I was similarly intrigued and bemused by The European Court of Justice ruling on sex equality in insurance that will mean that insurance companies are not going to be able to price according to the calculated risk of those wishing to be insured.

I share the frustration of parents who have seen their sons penalised by excessive insurance charges because they fall into the high risk young male driver bracket, but the pricing of insurance and premium rates are based on calculated odds. If we stop this, then what next?

If it is unfair to use claims experience to price insurance, then isn't it also unfair to use credit scoring models predicated on calculated experience? What an interesting conundrum that would be.

I may be becoming too old and cynical but the absence of common sense from EU decisions, of which the above are just two recent examples, drives me to despair!