Showing posts with label Cameron. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cameron. Show all posts

Friday, 18 October 2013

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Better Late than Never'


There's been a late payment furore this week, in my world at least. I was interviewed on 5Live Investigates on Sunday and then on Monday the Prime Minister announced that BIS is going to launch a consultation on the subject.

In the midst of Cameron's announcement he repeated the suggestion made by Vince Cable in August that there might be penalties or fines for late payment. Quite apart from the debate about the practicalities of implementing such a step, the point missed is that the Late Payment legislation introduced in 1998 and strengthened by subsequent Statutory Instruments, most recently in March this year, allows for a fixed fee to be charged and supplemented by additional recovery costs for invoices paid late. The Institute's press release issued on Monday makes the point that the late payment charges are, by definition, a fine or levy for late payment.

Lord Digby Jones entered the fray stating that the Prompt Payment Code wasn't effective. He said it was merely a nice statement of intent. But that's exactly what it is: a voluntary commitment to treat suppliers fairly and pay them according to the terms agreed! If it had the teeth that he is demanding, it would cease to be a voluntary code. Now I'm not saying it couldn't be improved nor am I disagreeing with the sentiment for other or more stringent measures but I do get frustrated when people say something isn't working when it's doing what it says on the tin!

Some critics have suggested that I'm personally responsible for the Code and its defender-in-chief. I'm not, the ICM simply hosts and administers it for government but let's not dismiss the benefits out of hand: nearly 1,500 organisations have signed up, including 72 of the FTSE100; many have made fundamental changes to improve their internal systems and processes; and a dialogue has started where conversations didn't previously exist. If the Code didn't exist, by the way, the debate wouldn't be taking place and the issue wouldn't be getting airtime in the way it is. These are tangible benefits and should neither be ignored nor trivialised.

The fact is that the Prompt Payment Code was introduced as a measure to drive a change in culture complementing other measures such as the late payment legislation, naming and shaming by business organisations, and good credit management practice which - all too often - is missing from business relationships. This last point was driven home to me at an ICM Regional Roadshow in London yesterday when attendees heard about the breadth of influence credit management has, and the value it adds, across the entire business.

Credit management isn't just about collecting cash from recalcitrant customers. Good credit management starts before an order is even received by assessing the risk of a potential customer, establishing its identity and status, ensuring that it is good for the sums of credit likely to be incurred, submitting invoices correctly and promptly, understanding its invoice processing and approval systems so that they can be met, and taking swift action if payment isn't going to arrive when it's expected.

I'm capturing a huge amount of activity in a single sentence and not doing it justice but my point is this: we have to change the culture to one where treating suppliers fairly is part of the corporate responsibility agenda and we have to stamp out exploitation of small businesses by organisations that wilfully take advantage of their supplier base but that's not the whole story. We also have to help businesses to help themselves by getting the basics right. Unless we do that, we'll never see the improvement we all seek.

Thursday, 11 October 2012

Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Meeting the aspiration of members'


Having attended two of the main party conferences in the last few weeks, they all bring home the importance of grass roots support, and understanding your audience. Much of what I saw and heard resonated with our own position: the need to understand our membership, from those just starting out in a career in credit management, to those who might already be at the top of their profession.
 
As I write, I have just heard David Cameron talk about the need for us to become an ‘aspiration nation’, and yet I witness this aspiration every day in talking to our members. Our members aspire to great things, both personally and in their professional lives, and recognise the role that the ICM plays in helping them achieve their ambitions.
 
There is a clear recognition of the Institute of Credit Management as a serious and professional organisation befitting the role of a professional membership body, and this position has been helped significantly by our ongoing engagement with Government and other like-minded professional bodies, and through our consistent profile in the national press.
 
There is recognition too of the importance of our Qualifications, and having a clear career development pathway for credit professionals to support them throughout their years in practice.
 
We recently asked our members what we are doing well and what else we might be doing to even further enhance the value of membership. We listened, and we are acting but the process is constantly evolving. I would like to thank all of those hundreds of members who have taken part so far, and strongly urge those who are currently sitting by the sidelines and watching to take part in the discussion. There are many challenges ahead, but by facing those challenges together, we can be sure that our Institute – and our members – can equally attain the goals to which we all aspire.