Weekly Blog by Philip King, CEO of the ICM - 'Stating the obvious'

The Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 contained provisions for the regulation of bailiffs and followed a White Paper published in 2003. Since then, I have been to numerous meetings to discuss the issue and the Ministry of Justice has been repeatedly promising a consultation on detailed proposals for a new regulatory regime. When Justice Minister Jonathan Djanogly announced this week the release of updated 'National Standards for Enforcement Agents', he also promised that the Standards are 'the first step towards tackling this issue (unscrupulous bailiffs), which will be followed shortly by proposals for a new regulatory regime.' I'm heartened that at last something seems to be happening but, although I understand the consultation is expected in Spring, I'm always nervous when I see the use of words like 'shortly'. I remember the importance of SMART objectives being used in business and I sometimes wish the public sector would apply the principles by putting a specific and measurable date on actions rather than using vague descriptors like 'soon' and 'shortly'.

Anyway, back to the updated Standards. They can be found here but don't expect to be overwhelmed by their content. Creditors' responsibilities include, among other things, that they should be aware of their own responsibilities, must not seek payment in order to secure a contract, must notify the enforcement agent if the debtor pays or contacts them, and must forewarn the debtor of impending enforcement action. The section 'Professionalism and conduct of the enforcement agent' says they must act within the law at all times, must not be deceitful by misrepresentation, must not act in a threatening manner, should always produce relevant identification, must not discriminate, and a few other similar instructions.

In short, there is little in the Standards that any credit professional or enforcement agent couldn't have written on the back of an envelope if asked to suggest what they should be. As the document says, they are not legally binding, but offered as a 'helpful tool for the industry and for creditors.' As Colin Naylor, Co-Chairman of CIVEA (the Civil Enforcement Association) points out: "these are the Industry's own standards......all the signatories are already committed to the practices and standards contained in the document........and most CIVEA members already publish similar creeds of professional behaviour."

So will they have any effect on 'unscrupulous' bailiffs? I think not, and I wish the time and effort in producing them had been spent on drafting the long-promised proposals for a new regulatory regime so that the consultation can get under way and we can see some real progress.